2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High field carotid vessel wall imaging: A study on reproducibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the limitations in current MRI diagnosis should be overcome with technological developments such as surface coil design and stronger magnetic fields. 16,17 Our results have limitations inherent in the retrospective design of the study. First, it is possible that the elevated ER ratios that we found in symptomatic patients could be the result, rather than the cause, of ischemic events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the limitations in current MRI diagnosis should be overcome with technological developments such as surface coil design and stronger magnetic fields. 16,17 Our results have limitations inherent in the retrospective design of the study. First, it is possible that the elevated ER ratios that we found in symptomatic patients could be the result, rather than the cause, of ischemic events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A more recent population-based study has reported considerably lower reproducibility in wall volume, normalized wall index, and mean wall thickness for a 3D IVW CMR sequence [ 25 ]. One of major possible reasons for the better performance of the whole-brain IVW CMR sequence in our study is that two repeat scans were in the same imaging session in healthy volunteers or days apart in patients.. Clearly this same-session investigation strategy for healthy subjects only reveals the scan-rescan repeatability instead of the true longitudinal repeatability of a technique, but has commonly been used in many previous studies [ 26 , 28 , 29 ]. Nevertheless, our findings suggest the possibility for reliable serial examination of IVW using the 3D whole-brain IVW CMR technique as previous carotid studies did [ 26 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Confidence intervals for the overall ICC were calculated by bootstrap taking in account the correlation between segments in the same patient. An ICC value of less than 0.4 was considered poor agreement, a value of 0.4–0.75 was considered good agreement, and a value of 0.75 or greater was considered excellent agreement [ 26 ]. Bland-Altman analysis was also used to determine the scan-rescan, intra-, and inter-observer reproducibility of 3D IVW CMR as well as inter-method agreement between 3D IVW CMR and 2D TSE in quantifying vessel dimensions for volunteers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-contrast MRI has been used widely in assessing plaque components and vulnerability [ 2 , 3 , 12 , 26 34 ]. Originally this was performed at 1.5 T [ 2 , 26 30 ], however the studies are now more commonly performed at 3 T due to the superior signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) [ 31 33 , 35 37 ]. In addition, the development of 3-D sequences allows for larger coverage, better through-plane resolution, higher scanning efficiency, less motion artefact and more precise plaque segmentation [ 3 , 12 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%