2018 IEEE Power &Amp; Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2018.8585933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Fidelity Model Order Reduction for Microgrids Stability Assessment

Abstract: Proper modeling of inverter-based microgrids is crucial for accurate assessment of stability boundaries. It has been recently realized that the stability conditions for such microgrids are significantly different from those known for largescale power systems. While detailed models are available, they are both computationally expensive and can not provide the insight into the instability mechanisms and factors. In this paper, a computationally efficient and accurate reduced-order model is proposed for modeling … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As power inverters can be controlled at much faster time-scales (milliseconds), when more and more synchronous machines are replaced by inverter-based generation, the transmission line dynamics, which are typically not accounted for in the theoretical analysis, can compromise the stability of the powernetwork. For droop controlled microgrids this phenomenon has been noted in [2], [16] and it can be verified experimentally for all control methods listed above. Moreover, in [16], [17] explicit and insightful bounds on the control gains are obtained via small signal stability analysis for a steady state with zero relative angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…As power inverters can be controlled at much faster time-scales (milliseconds), when more and more synchronous machines are replaced by inverter-based generation, the transmission line dynamics, which are typically not accounted for in the theoretical analysis, can compromise the stability of the powernetwork. For droop controlled microgrids this phenomenon has been noted in [2], [16] and it can be verified experimentally for all control methods listed above. Moreover, in [16], [17] explicit and insightful bounds on the control gains are obtained via small signal stability analysis for a steady state with zero relative angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Furthermore, saddlenode dynamics also appear naturally in Brayton-Moser potentials [27], [28], which suggests an additional path for future research. Application-wise, we plan to explore the effect of inductive line delays [28], [29], on the performance of secondary controls [5] in microgrids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, whenever η k τ k+1 ρ k+1 < 1 we have Next, as long as the system f k is contracting, we have z k − z k ≤ ( ż k + d k ) /β k . Using (29), assuming ξ k < β k (1 − η k τ k+1 ρ k+1 ), we arrive at (28).…”
Section: B Performance Of Layered Optimization Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We model the lines via nominal π sections (i.e., with RLC dynamics), model the transformers via three-phase linear transformer models, and consider constant impedance loads (see Table I for the parameters). We emphasize that the line dynamics cannot be neglected in the presence of grid-forming converters due to potential adverse interactions between their fast response and the line dynamics [16], [24], [29].…”
Section: Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the synchronous machine perfectly meets classic power system control objectives on slower time scales, the dominant feature of GFCs is their fast response. However, the fast response of GFCs can also result in unforeseen interactions with other parts of the system such as the slow SM response (shown here), line dynamics (see [16], [29]), and line limits [43].…”
Section: ) Loss Of Synchronous Machinementioning
confidence: 99%