2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Fe (Mg, Fe)O inclusion in diamond apparently from the lowermost mantle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Close comparison of inclusion and experimental ferropericlase compositions in specific cases have led to the interpretation that diamonds have been exhumed from depths spanning the entire lower mantle, including the D'' layer above the core-mantle-boundary (e.g. Hayman et al, 2005;Wirth et al, 2014). However, both natural samples (Kopylova et al, 1997;Stachel et al, 2000b) and experiments (Brey et al, 2004;Thomson et al, 2016) demonstrate the stability of ferropericlase with a range of compositions in equilibrium with diamond throughout the upper mantle in regions of low silica activity.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Close comparison of inclusion and experimental ferropericlase compositions in specific cases have led to the interpretation that diamonds have been exhumed from depths spanning the entire lower mantle, including the D'' layer above the core-mantle-boundary (e.g. Hayman et al, 2005;Wirth et al, 2014). However, both natural samples (Kopylova et al, 1997;Stachel et al, 2000b) and experiments (Brey et al, 2004;Thomson et al, 2016) demonstrate the stability of ferropericlase with a range of compositions in equilibrium with diamond throughout the upper mantle in regions of low silica activity.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fe-bearing phases with M 4 O 5 stoichiometry are relevant phases of the Earth's upper mantle and transition zone due to formation of solid solutions with Mg and Cr substituting for Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ , respectively (Woodland et al 2013;Ishii et al 2014Ishii et al , 2015 a Fe 2+ -rich magnesioferrite (Mg 0.42 Fe 0.58 )Fe 2 O 4 coexisting with ferropericlase (Mg,Fe)O and blebs of Fe-Ni alloy in a diamond host possibly from the lower mantle. The magnesioferrite was suggested to be exsolved from the original pure (Mg,Fe)O inclusion during upwelling in a plume (Wirth et al 2014). At pressures and temperatures of the transition zone, this Fe 2+ -rich magnesioferrite most likely was stable as Mg 2 Fe 2 O 5 +Fe 2 O 3 , making the Mg-end-member Mg 2 Fe 2 O 5 a relevant phase of the transition zone and the lower upper mantle.…”
Section: Structural Behavior Of Mg 2 Fe 2 O 5 With Pressurementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Both Harte et al (1999) and Wirth et al (2014) report features that exceed 100 nm in size and reach up to 3 µm long, while Kaminsky et al (2015) report much smaller Fe 3+ -rich regions that are less than 20 nm in size and as small as 1-2 nm. Results from the present study show a magnetic phase that is significantly larger than those observed by Kaminsky et al (2015) in diamonds from kimberlite pipes in the same area (Juina, Brazil).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 95%