2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High expression of post-treatment Ki-67 status is a risk factor for locoregional recurrence following breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ingolf and Yoshioka reported that high Ki67 expression in post‐treatment tumors was strongly correlated with poor DFS and OS, regardless of tumor subtype. Other studies corroborate that patients with high Ki67 values in the residual tumor after chemotherapy had worse outcomes in terms of recurrence and mortality .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Ingolf and Yoshioka reported that high Ki67 expression in post‐treatment tumors was strongly correlated with poor DFS and OS, regardless of tumor subtype. Other studies corroborate that patients with high Ki67 values in the residual tumor after chemotherapy had worse outcomes in terms of recurrence and mortality .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, we also found that 27.0% of patients displayed a significant increase in Ki-67 after NAC. In previous studies, high Ki-67 expression post-treatment was one of the most important prognostic predictors for clinical outcome [14,24,25]. Ki-67 index was also a predictive biomarker for a pathologic complete response.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 84%
“…It has been reported that Ki-67 is a nuclear protein with nuclear function, which is expressed in all phases of the cell cycle except G 0 phase. Therefore, Ki-67 has become the major markers of tumor proliferation (Ayed et al., 2014 ; Yamazaki et al., 2015 ). In this study, Ki-67 immunohistochemistry (Ki-67 IHC) was used to evaluate the proliferation level of different drug treated groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%