1988
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.37.359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-energy unitarity of gravitation and strings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
200
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
200
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the leading and next-to-leading terms in the large impact parameter expansion for arbitrary p can be computed and read 8) in perfect agreement with the string calculations in eq. (3.10).…”
Section: Classical Deflection Up To Next-to-leading Ordermentioning
confidence: 50%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, the leading and next-to-leading terms in the large impact parameter expansion for arbitrary p can be computed and read 8) in perfect agreement with the string calculations in eq. (3.10).…”
Section: Classical Deflection Up To Next-to-leading Ordermentioning
confidence: 50%
“…As we lower the impact parameter to study these two new regions, we should be able to make contact with the analysis of high-energy amplitudes at fixed angle as discussed in [9] and, in the context of D-branes, in [53,54]. Moreover, in these regimes the decomposition of the amplitude in partial waves should provide a very useful tool to clarify the main features of the scattering process, as discussed in [8,46,47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, such strong growth would eventually violate the unitarity bound once E ∼ M D , indicating that a fuller string calculation is required at higher energies, where the emission and exchange of string states is no longer negligible [101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108]. Second, it shows that it is the highest energy KK states that dominate in the cross section, and since these also have the shortest wavelength their properties (and the cross section) is largely insensitive to the details of the higher-dimensional geometry [109].…”
Section: Jhep10(2011)119mentioning
confidence: 99%