2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-energy emission processes in M87

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
23
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in contrast to previous modelling efforts of M87 (e.g. Abdo et al 2009, de Jong et al 2015, who reproduced the SED of the source with a standard homogeneous one-zone SSC model. The parameters explored in both of these works require the plasma emitting in the core region to be strongly particle-dominated, with Ue/U b 100, in order to produce a meaningful high-energy flux; this is in contrast with VLBI data, which favours a magneticallydominated core (10 −1 < Ue/U b < 10 −4 , Kino et al 2014, Hada et al 2016.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings are in contrast to previous modelling efforts of M87 (e.g. Abdo et al 2009, de Jong et al 2015, who reproduced the SED of the source with a standard homogeneous one-zone SSC model. The parameters explored in both of these works require the plasma emitting in the core region to be strongly particle-dominated, with Ue/U b 100, in order to produce a meaningful high-energy flux; this is in contrast with VLBI data, which favours a magneticallydominated core (10 −1 < Ue/U b < 10 −4 , Kino et al 2014, Hada et al 2016.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Despite such complex behaviour, the overall shape of the SED has been found in the past to be consistent with a standard one-zone synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) model (e.g. Abdo et al 2009, de Jong et al 2015, with the caveat that the implied bulk speed of the jet is far lower than that inferred from modelling blazar SEDs, in contrast with AGN unification models (Henri and Saugé 2006). One possible solution to this inconsistency, which is common for single-zone models, has been proposed by Tavecchio and Ghisellini (2008), who proposed that the jet is composed of an inner, relativistic spine and of a slower moving, outer sheath.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This conclusion is similar to Yuan & Cui (2005); Wu et al (2007); Yuan et al (2009), where the X-ray emission should be dominated by the jet, not the ADAF, if the Eddington ratio is less than a critical value. It should be noted that our ADAF-jet model cannot explain the optical-UV emission, which may be contributed by the host galaxy (Nemmen et al 2014;de Jong et al 2015), and the multiwaveband flux variations may help to test this issue. We find that different BH spin parameters (a * = 0 − 0.99) and magnetic parameters (β = 0.5 − 0.9) yield an equivalent fit of the SED, but the accretion rate has to be decreased if high BH spin and stronger magnetic field (lower β) are adopted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The acceleration zone of M87 jet may be co-spatial with the jet parabolic region, where the intrinsic jet velocity fields increase from ∼ 0.1 c at ∼ 10 2 R g to 1 c at ∼ 10 5 R g Asada et al 2014). The multi-wavelength nuclear SED of M87 has been extensively explored by both pure jet models (e.g., Dexter et al 2012;de Jong et al 2015;Prieto et al 2016) and ADAF+jet models (e.g., Di Matteo et al 2003;Yuan et al 2009;Broderick & Loeb 2009;Li et al 2009;Nemmen et al 2014;Mocibrodzka et al 2016), where the radio emission is produced by the jet in both models while the millimeter/sub-millimeter and X-ray emission can either come from the jet or ADAF. Apart from the continuum spectrum, linear polarization can be a diagnostic of the relativistic jets and accretion flows associated with BH systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19]), and we assume respectively for the BH spin and the external magnetic field, ca/(G M) = 0.9 and B 0 = 50 G. The magnetic field has been fixed to explain the observed high-energy luminosity which is few × 10 42 erg s −1 (e.g. [20,21]).…”
Section: Specific Quantitative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%