2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-017-5651-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-energy detector calibration data for k 0-neutron activation analysis

Abstract: In k0-neutron activation analysis, HPGe detectors have to be calibrated up to about 3.1 MeV, in order to properly determine the Na, Ca and S content of analytes. Commercial radioactive sources cover the energy range only up to 2.2 MeV, but with activation in the reactor, additional high-energy gamma emitter radionuclides (Ga-72, Mn-56, In-116 and Na-24) can be produced. At a prompt-gamma activation analysis station, where the calibration is available up to 12 MeV, we derived accurate gamma-ray energies and rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, measuring or computing peak and total detection e ciency for a close detector to source distance is cumbersome and complicated and might yield biased results [12]. In addition, the relatively large deviation observed for 56 Co and 72 Ga (compared to 24 Na and 56 Mn) at short detector to source distances can be attributed to improper estimation of true coincidence correction due to their complicated decay schemes and/or insu cient general con dence in their nuclear data [3,8,[13][14][15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, measuring or computing peak and total detection e ciency for a close detector to source distance is cumbersome and complicated and might yield biased results [12]. In addition, the relatively large deviation observed for 56 Co and 72 Ga (compared to 24 Na and 56 Mn) at short detector to source distances can be attributed to improper estimation of true coincidence correction due to their complicated decay schemes and/or insu cient general con dence in their nuclear data [3,8,[13][14][15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3 h irradiation was performed in a rotating, well-thermalized channel of the Budapest Research Reactor [ 27 ]. Together with the samples, flux-monitor foils of Au, Zr, Fe or Ni were co-irradiated, which are essential for the concentration calculations by the k0-method [ 28 ]. The thermal equivalent neutron flux in the rotating irradiation channel (No.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of major and trace elements in cements were determined by prompt gamma activation analysis (PGAA), and the assessment of the trace elements with large activation cross section was perform by neutron activation analysis (NAA), both using the k0-standardization method, [15]. PGAA gives precise results for major elements like Si, Ti, Al, Fe, Mn, Mg, Ca, Na, K and H in cement specimens.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time flux-monitor foils of Au, Zr, Fe or Ni were co-irradiated for concentration calculations by the k0-method, [15]. The thermal equivalent neutron flux in the rotating irradiation channel was 1.86x10 13 cm 2 s -1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%