2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2008.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-energy cosmic-ray fluxes in the Earth atmosphere: Calculations vs experiments

Abstract: A new calculation of the atmospheric fluxes of cosmic-ray hadrons and muons in the energy range 10-10 5 GeV has been performed for the set of hadron production models, EPOS 1.6, QGSJET II-03, SIBYLL 2.1, and others that are of interest to cosmic ray physicists. The fluxes of secondary cosmic rays at several levels in the atmosphere are computed using directly data of the ATIC-2, GAMMA experiments, and the model proposed recently by Zatsepin and Sokolskaya as well as the parameterization of the primary cosmic r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
49
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In similar fashion meson cascade equations can be solved using the nucleon and meson sources [24]. The main pion sources in the atmospheric shower are the interactions of nucleons and pions with air nuclei and kaon decays.…”
Section: A Outline Of the Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In similar fashion meson cascade equations can be solved using the nucleon and meson sources [24]. The main pion sources in the atmospheric shower are the interactions of nucleons and pions with air nuclei and kaon decays.…”
Section: A Outline Of the Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are widely employed to simulate extensive air showers (EAS) with the Monte Carlo method, and were also applied to compute the cosmic-ray hadron and muon fluxes [24,25]. Besides, in this work computation we employ also the old known hadronic model by Kimel & Mokhov (KM) [26] which was checked by comparison of the calculated atmospheric hadron and muon spectra with the experiment [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between a few hundred GeV and 3 TeV, and again from 100 TeV to 1 PeV, there are large gaps where experimental measurements of individual primary fluxes are sparse and contain substantial uncertainties [20]. Especially the second region is of high importance to IceCube physics, because it corresponds to neutrino energies of tens of TeV where indications for astrophysical fluxes start to become visible.…”
Section: Cosmic Rays In the Icecube Energy Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, due to the higher slope of the energy spectrum of the primary particles (a coefficient of the slope of the difference spectrum is γ = 2.75) the generation of secondary particles (π ± -mesons and K ± -mesons) with the highest energies is of importance. It was shown [8] that the QGSJET II-03 model [4] leads to a spectrum of vertical muons, the intensity of which is about a factor f = 1.5 times less than the data of collaborations L3 + Cosmic [9], MACRO [10] and LVD [11]. The result [8] was obtained as a solution of transport equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown [8] that the QGSJET II-03 model [4] leads to a spectrum of vertical muons, the intensity of which is about a factor f = 1.5 times less than the data of collaborations L3 + Cosmic [9], MACRO [10] and LVD [11]. The result [8] was obtained as a solution of transport equations. The π ± and K ± mesons decay into µ ± -mesons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%