1995
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(95)00392-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High efficiency positron moderation a feasibility study of the slow beam confinement extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. The sources for this experiment were 48 V created by irradiation of 1 µm Ti foils exploiting the reaction 48 Ti(p,n) 48 V with 8 MeV protons from the ETHZ TANDEM accelerator and with 18 MeV protons using the external beam line of the IBA 18/9 medical cyclotron located at the Inselspital in Bern, Switzerland [49].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2. The sources for this experiment were 48 V created by irradiation of 1 µm Ti foils exploiting the reaction 48 Ti(p,n) 48 V with 8 MeV protons from the ETHZ TANDEM accelerator and with 18 MeV protons using the external beam line of the IBA 18/9 medical cyclotron located at the Inselspital in Bern, Switzerland [49].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, developments are underway that should allow one to achieve 10 MBq activities of the foils in less than 1 day irradiation using solid target stations usually employed for the production of radioisotopes with medical cyclotrons. Therefore, 48 V is interesting for targeted measurements. For long term operation, better choices for the β + emitter are 58 Co or 22 Na with half-lives of 70 days and 2.6 years respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2014). Particle collisions with the target are assumed to lead to loss, a pessimistic assumption as not all scattering will lead to loss (in fact, this would likely moderate the particles to lower energy, making them easier to trap (Mills 1980; Gerola, Waeber & Shi 1995; Gerchow et al. 2018)).…”
Section: Laser-produced Electron–positron Plasmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Losses through the mirror ends are due to particles moving non-adiabatically through phase space into the loss cone (Porazik et al 2014). Particle collisions with the target are assumed to lead to loss, a pessimistic assumption as not all scattering will lead to loss (in fact, this would likely moderate the particles to lower energy, making them easier to trap (Mills 1980;Gerola, Waeber & Shi 1995;Gerchow et al 2018)). The confinement time is of the order of 1 ns, which is approximately 10 bounce periods (figure 7b).…”
Section: Magnetic Confinement Of Laser-produced Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%