The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2022
DOI: 10.1002/admi.202200108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐Efficiency Luminescent Solar Concentrators Based on Antifogging and Frost‐Resisting Fluorescent Polymers: Adding Multiple Functions for Sustained Performance

Abstract: Luminescent solar concentrators (LSCs) are light‐management devices able to harvest and downshift sunlight, making it available to edge‐coupled photovoltaic cells for light‐to‐electricity conversion. When operating in real‐life outdoor scenarios, LSCs can be exposed to humid/freezing environments which may yield fogging and frosting, ultimately resulting in detrimental performance decay owing to reduced photon absorption and photon trapping efficiency within the waveguide. To address this issue, the first demo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To study the light concentrating ability of the concentrators, the η opt of the LSCs were measured according to the method proposed by Griffini et al [49,50] Encouragingly, the η opt values of the PPF-IF, PPF-NIF, and PPF-F based LSCs were determined to be 5.71 ± 0.08%, 9.12 ± 0.13%, and 12.08 ± 0.06%, respectively. Subsequently, an LSC-solar cell system was fabricated to evaluate its photon-to-electron conversion capability, which is shown in Figure 3a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To study the light concentrating ability of the concentrators, the η opt of the LSCs were measured according to the method proposed by Griffini et al [49,50] Encouragingly, the η opt values of the PPF-IF, PPF-NIF, and PPF-F based LSCs were determined to be 5.71 ± 0.08%, 9.12 ± 0.13%, and 12.08 ± 0.06%, respectively. Subsequently, an LSC-solar cell system was fabricated to evaluate its photon-to-electron conversion capability, which is shown in Figure 3a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49, and the values for the light passing through PPF-IF, PPF-NIF, and PPF-F based LSCs are still as high as 95.74, 92.71, and 93.24, respectively. To experimentally verify that these LSCs have good color rendering ability, they were utilized as filters to take pictures of different color-dominated scenes, as shown in Figure4d.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some recent examples of this type include small-molecule or 𝜋-conjugated-polymer pairs, [18][19][20] aggregation-induced-emission luminophores, [21][22][23] dendrimeric structures [24,25] and nanoparticle-based hybrid systems, [26,27] in some cases in the presence of a photoactive host matrix taking part in the FRET process. [28][29][30] In this device configuration, a key role is played by the photophysical characteristics of the luminophores and by their concentration in the host matrix, the latter influencing their average intermolecular distance, identified by the so-called critical FRET radius R 0 , which should be in the 2-6 nm range for optimal interaction. [17,31] Alternative strategies for FRET-based LSC systems have targeted the covalent incorporation of one or more luminophores within the macromolecular structure of the host matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%