2011
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.052985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High efficiency in human muscle: an anomaly and an opportunity?

Abstract: SummaryCan human muscle be highly efficient in vivo? Animal muscles typically show contraction-coupling efficiencies <50% in vitro but a recent study reports that the human first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of the hand has an efficiency value in vivo of 68%. We examine two key factors that could account for this apparently high efficiency value: (1) transfer of cross-bridge work into mechanical work and (2) the use of elastic energy to do external work. Our analysis supports a high contractile efficiency … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 as elevations in ATP max of the quadriceps (ΔATP max , 32%) and the power output by the legs at VȮ 2,max (ΔP max , 17%). The smaller rise in P max versus ATP max (Δ17%/Δ32%=0.53) is exactly what is expected from the 50% contraction efficiency of converting ATP into muscle work in humans (Nelson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Elevating Etc Flux In Old Mitochondriasupporting
confidence: 57%
“…3 as elevations in ATP max of the quadriceps (ΔATP max , 32%) and the power output by the legs at VȮ 2,max (ΔP max , 17%). The smaller rise in P max versus ATP max (Δ17%/Δ32%=0.53) is exactly what is expected from the 50% contraction efficiency of converting ATP into muscle work in humans (Nelson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Elevating Etc Flux In Old Mitochondriasupporting
confidence: 57%
“…), assuming an ATP change of standard Gibbs free energy (Δ G °) of 52 kJ mol −1 (Nelson et al . ). Using the submaximal V̇normalO2–power relationship, the power output eliciting an O 2 demand equal to the measured V̇O2 max was 258 ± 30 W. These two estimations (213 and 258 W) of the maximal aerobically sustainable load were significantly lower than the W mean reached during the sprints.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…S2). The power output that is possible from ΔATP max can be estimated from the free energy of ATP hydrolysis (55 J mmol −1 for the phosphocreatine and pH levels during exercise; Conley et al 2012), the increase in muscle volume (Δ V Q ) and the efficiency of converting ATP into work (ɛ c = 0.5 or 50% for human muscle; Whipp & Wasserman, 1969; Nelson et al 2011). This calculation yields an increase of 12 W (=ΔATP max ×Δ V Q ×ɛ c ), which indicates that the quadriceps was responsible for a significant fraction of the measured increase in P max of 17 W. This result suggests that the majority of the adaptation in leg power output came from the quadriceps, with a smaller contribution from other thigh muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%