Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 1st World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion - WCPEC (A Joint Conference of PVSC, PVSEC and
DOI: 10.1109/wcpec.1994.519811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se/sub 2/-based solar cells: processing of novel absorber structures

Abstract: Our effort towards the attainment of high performance devices has yielded several devices with total-area conversion efficiencies above 16%, the highest measuring 16.8% under standard reporting conditions (ASTM E892-87, Global 1000 W/m'). The first attempts to translate this development to larger areas resulted in an efficiency of 12.5% for a 1 6.8-cm2 monolithically interconnected submodule test structure, and 15.3% for a 4.85-cm' single cell. Achievement of a 17.2% device efficiency fabricated for operation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(7 reference statements)
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With similar GGI ratios for the CIGS films deposited by the co-evaporation processes, the corresponding bandgap energies are nearly the same. Nevertheless, the CIGS films prepared by the three-stage process had a double grading bandgap structure, meaning that the bandgap energies at the notch point of the V-shape grading structure had lower values than the effective optical bandgap energies [35][36][37]. Thus, the absorption edge of the CIGS films prepared by the three-stage process extended to the longer wavelengths than those of the films prepared by the other evaporation processes, as shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Cigs Solar Cells Prepared By Various Depomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…With similar GGI ratios for the CIGS films deposited by the co-evaporation processes, the corresponding bandgap energies are nearly the same. Nevertheless, the CIGS films prepared by the three-stage process had a double grading bandgap structure, meaning that the bandgap energies at the notch point of the V-shape grading structure had lower values than the effective optical bandgap energies [35][36][37]. Thus, the absorption edge of the CIGS films prepared by the three-stage process extended to the longer wavelengths than those of the films prepared by the other evaporation processes, as shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Cigs Solar Cells Prepared By Various Depomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…5(a), the band gap profile of the standard solar cell consists of the graded band gap structure because of the three-stage deposition process. The diffusion length of electrons generated by the long wavelength light near the back electrode is improved due to the quasi-electric field in which the CIGS layer forms (Contreras et al, 1994b). The graded band gap structure is therefore beneficial for collecting the photogenerated carriers.…”
Section: Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, an accurately tailored double-graded Ga concentration may allow for the engineering of a specific energy gap (E G ) design ( Figure 4). If this design is followed, a back grading will provide an additional drift field for the minority electrons, and this will in turn improve carrier collection and reduce back-contact recombination [8][9][10]. A second Ga grading will appear near the CIGS/CdS interface where the Ga concentration will be made higher towards the p-n junction.…”
Section: The In 2 Se 3 Ga 2 Se 3 and Cu Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%