2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2014.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High dynamic range compression and detail enhancement of infrared images in the gradient domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The brief characteristics of the test images are described in Table 1; the original test images were blurry due to the atmospheric turbulence and point spread function (PSF) of the optical lens. Because there is no universal objective criterion for IR image quality assessment, and several blind image quality assessment metrics perform inconsistently on IR images [3], we performed a comparison using the average gradient (AG), which is widely used as an indicator for the evaluation of the edge detail contrast and sharpness characteristics of an image [4]. The AG can be calculated as follows:…”
Section: Experimental Results Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The brief characteristics of the test images are described in Table 1; the original test images were blurry due to the atmospheric turbulence and point spread function (PSF) of the optical lens. Because there is no universal objective criterion for IR image quality assessment, and several blind image quality assessment metrics perform inconsistently on IR images [3], we performed a comparison using the average gradient (AG), which is widely used as an indicator for the evaluation of the edge detail contrast and sharpness characteristics of an image [4]. The AG can be calculated as follows:…”
Section: Experimental Results Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant IR image detail improvement methods can be divided into mapping-based approaches, gradient-domain algorithms, and decomposition-based methods [3]. The typical disadvantages of gradient-domain algorithms [4] typically include being computationally expensive and having poor stability, while the mapping-based approaches [5,6] provide relatively limited improvements in the details. Consequently, the existing high-performance detail enhancement methods for IR image processing are decomposition-based methods [7], which separate a detail layer from the input image and assign higher weight before merging, providing outstanding detail and contrast enhancement performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the relatively low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) characteristics of IR images, some researchers adopted wavelet related algorithms to achieve better noise-reducing performance and edges preserving effects [11,12], while others separated the detail/edge information from the original IR image for different downstream tasks [13][14][15][16][17]. Furthermore, top-hat transform [18], gradient domain [19,20], shearlet domain [21,22] and frequency domain [23] have also been investigated for the IR edge/detail enhancement purpose. Some other related works including an improved unsharp mask algorithm [24], gradient distribution via Cellular Automata [25], morphological operators [26], all-optical upconversion imaging techniques [27], the iterative contrast enhancement method [28], and the gravitational force and lateral inhibition network [29].…”
Section: Non-deep Learning Based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach is to express the DRR problem as the minimization of a function in the gradient domain. 23 Qiao and Ng 24 presented a method to reduce the dynamic range of high-dynamic-range visible image by using localized gamma correction. The idea was adopted from a paper focused on IR image data, but applied to the visible domain.…”
Section: Infrared Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%