2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-dose thiotepa, melphalan and carboplatin (TMCb) followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma – a retrospective evaluation

Abstract: Summary:The purpose of this evaluation was to investigate the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy with thiotepa, melphalan, and carboplatin (TMCb), and of autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) infusion in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD). A total of 42 patients, 23 with intermediate-grade NHL and 19 with HD, received thiotepa (500 mg/m 2 ), melphalan (100 mg/m 2 ), and carboplatin (1050-1350 mg/m 2 ) followed by autologous PBSC infusion. Of 21 patients with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In keeping with published experience, [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] the main combination partners of TT were carmustine, melphalan, busulfan and cyclophosphamide. No significant differences for any safety or efficacy end point could be demonstrated between BEAM-and TT-based regimens for the whole population as well as for relatively large groups of the DLBCL, HL and FL subentities, except a significantly higher relapse risk with TT in the DLBCL CR/PR1 subset (which is not a standard indication for auto-SCT).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In keeping with published experience, [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] the main combination partners of TT were carmustine, melphalan, busulfan and cyclophosphamide. No significant differences for any safety or efficacy end point could be demonstrated between BEAM-and TT-based regimens for the whole population as well as for relatively large groups of the DLBCL, HL and FL subentities, except a significantly higher relapse risk with TT in the DLBCL CR/PR1 subset (which is not a standard indication for auto-SCT).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Progression rate (54%) remained the most important concern. With the aim of increasing anti‐tumour effect, we added thiotepa to the treosulfan–fludarabine combination in preparing high‐risk patients to haemopoietic allogeneic transplantation. This new trial was concentrated in patients with advanced lympho‐proliferative diseases in advanced phases and heavily pre‐treated who could not be a candidate to conventional‐intensity myeloablative preparative regimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%