2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy as a Monotherapy for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Phase II Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Favorable intermediate risk patients were defined as those with a Gleason score of 3+4=7, cT2b disease, and 50% positive core biopsies (5). Low risk and favorable intermediate risk patients may be treated with HDR brachytherapy monotherapy (5,6,12,14). Unfavorable intermediate risk patients had a Gleason score of 4+3=7, cT2c disease, or >50% positive core biopsies (15,16).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Favorable intermediate risk patients were defined as those with a Gleason score of 3+4=7, cT2b disease, and 50% positive core biopsies (5). Low risk and favorable intermediate risk patients may be treated with HDR brachytherapy monotherapy (5,6,12,14). Unfavorable intermediate risk patients had a Gleason score of 4+3=7, cT2c disease, or >50% positive core biopsies (15,16).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been only one prior report on HRQOL changes due to HDR brachytherapy monotherapy for prostate cancer (12). As a result, we studied HRQOL changes in this select group of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…По данным М. Barkati и соавт. [22], опубликованным в 2012 г., брахитерапию с высокой мощностью дозы можно рассматривать в качестве монотерапии для пациентов группы низкого и про-межуточного риска. Такое лечение в период с 2003 по 2008 г. было проведено 79 пациентам с РПЖ T2b-T2c стадии.…”
Section: брахитерапияunclassified
“…Additional data are needed to understand the relationship between dose to sub-volumes of the prostate treated and its impact on urinary morbidity. Current literature is also hampered by the majority of studies reporting physician assessed toxicities, which are known to underestimate true toxicity relative to patient-reported outcomes (19).…”
Section: Urinary Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%