2001
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Dose Melphalan, Etoposide, Total-Body Irradiation, and Autologous Stem-Cell Reconstitution as Consolidation Therapy for High-Risk Ewing’s Sarcoma Does Not Improve Prognosis

Abstract: Consolidation with high-dose melphalan, etoposide, TBI, and autologous stem-cell support failed to improve the probability of EFS in this cohort of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic ES.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
128
3
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
128
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These rates are comparable to published PFS rates after conventional therapy (chemotherapy, surgery and irradiation) in patients with similar disease characteristics though the recent addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to conventional therapy has resulted in higher PFS rates in patients with local disease. 2,4 Further, PFS rates reported in the current study where patients received ASCT at several institutions over a decade are comparable to those reported by others 22,23 and suggest that the results of these smaller prospective trials are generalizable to the results of ASCT as practiced by the North American transplant community. Most patients with recurrent disease prior to transplantation achieved a complete or partial remission prior to ASCT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…These rates are comparable to published PFS rates after conventional therapy (chemotherapy, surgery and irradiation) in patients with similar disease characteristics though the recent addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to conventional therapy has resulted in higher PFS rates in patients with local disease. 2,4 Further, PFS rates reported in the current study where patients received ASCT at several institutions over a decade are comparable to those reported by others 22,23 and suggest that the results of these smaller prospective trials are generalizable to the results of ASCT as practiced by the North American transplant community. Most patients with recurrent disease prior to transplantation achieved a complete or partial remission prior to ASCT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Some studies suggested an improvement in clinical outcomes, [37][38][39] whereas others did not. 40,41 In the current study, HDC with hematopoietic stem cell rescue failed to improve EFS significantly among high-risk patients. Precise assessment of the utility of HDC for patients with high-risk ESFT will require massive prospective, controlled studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Event-free survival was not improved compared with the literature. In 2001, Meyers et al 17 published a further report focusing on patients with bone or BM metastases. Out of 32 patients with high-risk ET-MBM, 23 patients were transplanted after induction therapy with CY, doxorubicin and VCR alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide and myeloablative therapy with melphalan, etoposide and TBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such limitations are characteristic for many studies in high-risk ET-MBM. 17 Successful treatment of high-risk ET-MBM needs both systemic chemotherapy and local control. Our data suggest that TB-MRI may facilitate precise identification of initial metastases in high-risk ET-MBM and that sufficient ICI may decrease the relapse rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation