1978
DOI: 10.1002/cpt1978245610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐dose intravenous and hepatic artery infusions of thymidine

Abstract: Thymidine (TdR) was administered by constant infusion at progressively escalated dose rates to 4 patients with colon cancer metastatic to liver in whom hepatic arterial (HA) and hepatic venous (HV) catheters had been placed. Serum levels ofTdR and hepatic extraction ofTdR were determined as a function of dose rate. With intravenous infusions, serum levels of TdR rose progressively with dose rate, going from 1.3 to 3.4 µM at 8 gm/M2/day to 1,200 µM at 128 gm/M2/day. The hepatic extraction ratio at dose rates up… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the data is limited, significantly (i.e. > 2-fold) increased exposure with hepatic arterial infusion is seen for a number of other agents including dichloromethotrexate (Ensminger et al, 1981b), thymidine (Ensminger and Frei, 1978), bischlorethylnitrosourea (Ensminger et al, 1978b), mitomycin C (Tseng et al, 1981), and cis-platinum (Kelsen et al, 1980). The theoretical principles described above assume that the rate coefficients of drug loss remain constant over the complete range of drug concentrations and throughout the time periods involved.…”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the data is limited, significantly (i.e. > 2-fold) increased exposure with hepatic arterial infusion is seen for a number of other agents including dichloromethotrexate (Ensminger et al, 1981b), thymidine (Ensminger and Frei, 1978), bischlorethylnitrosourea (Ensminger et al, 1978b), mitomycin C (Tseng et al, 1981), and cis-platinum (Kelsen et al, 1980). The theoretical principles described above assume that the rate coefficients of drug loss remain constant over the complete range of drug concentrations and throughout the time periods involved.…”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical principles described above assume that the rate coefficients of drug loss remain constant over the complete range of drug concentrations and throughout the time periods involved. Data obtained with increasing dose rates of thymidine given into the hepatic artery demonstrate that extraction processes can become increasingly saturated with the hepatic extraction dropping from 80~o at 4 g/m: per day to less than 20~ at 128 g/m 2 per day (Ensminger and Frei, 1978). Non-linear pharmacokinetics with saturable elimination also apparently hold for infusions of the radiosensitizer 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (Sonneveld et al, 1982).…”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synergy was demonstrable across a broad spectrum ofdrug effect, ranging from concentrations that reduced the net growth rate to zero to concentrations that killed 90% ofthe cells in the culture. These concentrations encompass a range that is readily achieved in patients (39)(40)(41)(42)(43). In addition, the results indicate that dThd and HU interact synergistically, so that the triple combination of Ara-C, dThd, and HU is synergistic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Cells were exposed to the. clinically achievable concentrations of 1 mM dThd (39)(40)(41) and HU (42), and 0.1 ,uM Ara-C (43). The effects of dThd were qualitatively and quantitatively different in SB cells than in the leukemic blasts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MTD is 75-80 g/m2/d as a CI lasting 3 to 7 days in patients with solid tumors, and CPs s of 1 to 2 mM are achieved [30][31][32][33][34]. Dose limiting toxicity involved the CNS (headache, confusion, somnolence), gastrointestinal tract (anorexia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea), and bone marrow (leukopenia).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%