2005
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v106.11.129.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Dose Cyclophosphamide (CY) for Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA): Safety and Long Term Follow-Up.

Abstract: Background: Acquired SAA is a potentially life-threatening bone marrow failure disorder that is usually immune-mediated. SAA can be effectively treated with bone marrow transplantation (BMT), immunosuppressive therapy (IST), or CY. BMT can cure the disease but ideally requires a matched sibling donor. IST has a high response rate, but up to 50% of patients relapse, become dependent on cyclosporine, or develop secondary clonal disease such as paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) or myelodysplastic syndrome… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Important differences between this study and other high‐dose CY studies 9,28–32 include the lack of standard G‐CSF use and the addition of CSA to the high‐dose CY regimen. An update on the outcomes of high‐dose CY for SAA reported a mortality rate of 10% (4 of 38) in the first 6 months after treatment 33. These results compare favorably to the mortality rate in SAA after treatment with ATG/CSA 34; however, in the absence of a large randomized trial, caution must be used in comparing these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important differences between this study and other high‐dose CY studies 9,28–32 include the lack of standard G‐CSF use and the addition of CSA to the high‐dose CY regimen. An update on the outcomes of high‐dose CY for SAA reported a mortality rate of 10% (4 of 38) in the first 6 months after treatment 33. These results compare favorably to the mortality rate in SAA after treatment with ATG/CSA 34; however, in the absence of a large randomized trial, caution must be used in comparing these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%