2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-dose and fractionation effects in stereotactic radiation therapy: Analysis of tumor control data from 2965 patients

Abstract: Our analysis suggests that distinct tumoricidal mechanisms do not determine tumor control at high doses/fraction. In addition, there is evidence suggesting that multi-fraction SRT is superior to single-dose SRT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
107
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
107
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In non-small cell lung cancer, BED calculated using the linear quadratic model correlates strongly with tumor control probability regardless of the fractionation scheme 9 . Similar results have been observed in patients treated for brain metastases 11 . Because the linear quadratic model does not take into account distinct biological mechanisms at higher radiation doses, these correlative studies do not support the idea that there are fundamental differences in tumor response to radiation therapy at the high doses per fraction used for SBRT 4 .…”
Section: Sbrt Mechanisms Of Actionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In non-small cell lung cancer, BED calculated using the linear quadratic model correlates strongly with tumor control probability regardless of the fractionation scheme 9 . Similar results have been observed in patients treated for brain metastases 11 . Because the linear quadratic model does not take into account distinct biological mechanisms at higher radiation doses, these correlative studies do not support the idea that there are fundamental differences in tumor response to radiation therapy at the high doses per fraction used for SBRT 4 .…”
Section: Sbrt Mechanisms Of Actionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…2 Although the mathematical models are useful, there may be unexplored benefits from studying the molecular and cellular effects of different doses and schedules, particularly when major alterations in therapy are undertaken as with the current use of hypofractionation. The articles by Brown et al, 3 Shuryak et al, 5 and McKenna et al 63 conclude that no additional tumoricidal mechanisms are needed to explain the tumor control at higher doses compared with lower doses. Firstly, an important caveat from clinical experience is that significant late effects may not occur for years or decades as seen with standard fractionation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in the shape of the radiation survival curve using various radiobiological models from clinical data helps to explain the clinical outcome from both dose size and fractionation scheme. 5,6 Conventional RT (ConvRT) is administered in 1.8–2.2 Gy single fractions per day, 5 days per week for a total of 3–9 weeks, and maximum dose between 60 and 90 Gy. 7–9 In contrast, hyperfractionated RT (HyperRT) is administered in smaller doses of 0.5–1.8 Gy with multiple fractions per day for 2–4 weeks, and hypofractionated RT (HypoRT) as single daily fractions 3–20 Gy with a small number of fractions usually over a week.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, there is evidence that single-fraction stereotactic RT lacks a dose-response relationship and achieves lower tumor control rates than 3 or more fractions even if the same ‘biologically effective doses' are applied [105,106], which is consistent with a detrimental effect of missing re-oxygenation [107]. Oxygen is required for the production of superoxide from cell water radiolysis products, which greatly enhances the toxicity of IR [57].…”
Section: Combining Ketogenic Metabolic Therapy With Radiotherapy To Ementioning
confidence: 99%