2000
DOI: 10.1134/1.1324020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-density phenomena in hydrogen plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But ion crystallization is expected to be possible also for much smaller mass ratios: proton crystallization (M = 1836) in dense hydrogen has been found in our previous simulations 35 , see also…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But ion crystallization is expected to be possible also for much smaller mass ratios: proton crystallization (M = 1836) in dense hydrogen has been found in our previous simulations 35 , see also…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…34 but in general were not sufficiently precise and efficient for practical purposes. In recent years an improved path integral representation of the N-particle density operator has been developed 35,36,37 that allows for direct fermionic path integral Monte Carlo (DPIMC) simulations of dense plasmas in a large range of temperatures and densities, see 42 for an introduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our procedure has been extensively tested. In particular, we found from comparison with the known analytical expressions for pressure and energy of an ideal Fermi gas that the Fermi statistics is very well reproduced [26]. Further, we performed extensive tests for few-electron systems in a harmonic trap where, again, the analytically known limiting behavior (e.g.…”
Section: Comparison Of Direct and Restricted Pimc Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…. 20 are adequate [24,26]. We will now compare our results with some available results obtained by the Monte Carlo technique developed by the Urbana group [19,32].…”
Section: Comparison Of Direct and Restricted Pimc Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…While restricted PIMC (RPIMC) results for dense multi-component quantum plasmas, e.g. [21,22] as well as direct fermionic PIMC (DPIMC) results [23][24][25][26] have been available already for 15 years, only recently finite temperature RPIMC results for the UEG (or jellium) have been obtained [27]. It is well known that fermionic PIMC simulation in continuous space suffer from the fermion sign problem (FSP) which is known to be NP hard [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%