2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01944.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High cyanobiont selectivity of epiphytic lichens in old growth boreal forest of Finland

Abstract: Research Summary• Here, cyanobiont selectivity of epiphytic lichen species was examined in an old growth forest area in Finland.• Samples of the eight lichen species were collected from the same aspen ( Populus tremula ) and adjacent aspens in the same stand. The cyanobionts of these samples were compared with free and symbiotic Nostoc obtained from other habitats and geographic regions.• Our results, based on the phylogenetic analysis of a partial small subunit of the ribosomal DNA (16S rDNA) and the rbcLX ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
66
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
12
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…strain 152. The lichen-symbiotic Nostoc form several lineages, including those associated with host fungi of the Nephroma guild (A-F) and the Peltigera guild (G-L) (4,12). This shows that the geographical origin of a lichen specimen does not predict the identity of the Nostoc symbiont, and that the production of detectable amounts of toxins is not restricted to well-defined groups within Nostoc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…strain 152. The lichen-symbiotic Nostoc form several lineages, including those associated with host fungi of the Nephroma guild (A-F) and the Peltigera guild (G-L) (4,12). This shows that the geographical origin of a lichen specimen does not predict the identity of the Nostoc symbiont, and that the production of detectable amounts of toxins is not restricted to well-defined groups within Nostoc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some fungi show high selectivity, and they associate with a particular photobiont phylogenetic clade or species (Kroken & Taylor 2000;Helms et al 2001;Beck et al 2002;PierceyNormore 2004PierceyNormore , 2006Yahr et al 2004;Stenroos et al 2006;Myllys et al 2007). Other fungal species are far less selective towards their photobiont partners (Wirtz et al 2003;Piercey-Normore 2004;Yahr et al 2004;Myllys et al 2007); some may occasionally or always associate with two photobiont species (Piercey-Normore 2006; Casano et al 2011). Some fungal species are able to partner up with photobionts belonging to different kingdoms, and which photobiont partner gets involved in the symbiosis may depend on environmental conditions (Goffinet & Bayer 1997;Tønsberg & Goward 2001;Summerfield et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Lobaria pulmonaria and Peltigera venosa are exceptions to this rule. Both species were shown to associate with a wide range of Nostoc strains (Paulsrud & Lindblad 2002;Rikkinen et al 2002;Myllys et al 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lichen-forming fungi seem to be highly selective in choosing their cyanobacterial partner because only a few closely related Nostoc strains typically serve as the appropriate symbiotic partner for each fungal species (Paulsrud et al 1998(Paulsrud et al , 2000Lohtander et al 2003;Stenroos et al 2006;Myllys et al 2007;Lü cking et al 2009;Rikkinen 2009). However, Lobaria pulmonaria and Peltigera venosa are exceptions to this rule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%