2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.30.179648
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-content Imaging-based Pooled CRISPR Screens in Mammalian Cells

Abstract: ABSTRACTCRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) -based gene inactivation provides a powerful means of linking genes to particular cellular phenotypes. CRISPR-based screening has mostly relied upon using large genomic pools of single guide RNAs (sgRNAs). However, this approach is limited to phenotypes that can be enriched by chemical selection or FACS sorting. Here, we developed a microscopy-based approach, which we name optical enrichment, to computat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pooled CRISPR screen outperforms array‐based screen by its scalability and low cost, however, was largely restricted to standard readouts, including survival, proliferation, and FACS‐sortable markers (Hanna & Doench, 2020). Most recently, combining with microscopy‐based approaches, CRISPR screen enabled the association of subcellular phenotypes with perturbation of specific gene(s) (Wheeler et al , 2020; preprint: Yan et al , 2020). In studying regulation of gene expression, Perturb‐seq, CRISP‐seq, and CROP‐seq, which combine CRISPR‐based gene editing with single‐cell mRNA sequencing, allowed transcriptome profile to serve as comprehensive molecular readout (Adamson et al , 2016; Dixit et al , 2016; Datlinger et al , 2017), but often with limited throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pooled CRISPR screen outperforms array‐based screen by its scalability and low cost, however, was largely restricted to standard readouts, including survival, proliferation, and FACS‐sortable markers (Hanna & Doench, 2020). Most recently, combining with microscopy‐based approaches, CRISPR screen enabled the association of subcellular phenotypes with perturbation of specific gene(s) (Wheeler et al , 2020; preprint: Yan et al , 2020). In studying regulation of gene expression, Perturb‐seq, CRISP‐seq, and CROP‐seq, which combine CRISPR‐based gene editing with single‐cell mRNA sequencing, allowed transcriptome profile to serve as comprehensive molecular readout (Adamson et al , 2016; Dixit et al , 2016; Datlinger et al , 2017), but often with limited throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We engineered two complementary Arch-derived GEVIs using a video-based, pooled screening platform ("Photopick") for mammalian cells. Pooled screens offer the practical advantage of lower cost and higher throughput compared to arrayed screens (Feldman et al, 2019;Hasle et al, 2020;Kanfer et al, 2021;Lawson et al, 2021;Lee et al, 2020;Piatkevich et al, 2018;Yan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, two recent efforts describe innovative pooled optical screen methodologies utilising cells expressing photo-convertible mCherry-based reporters. The authors described experimental pipelines of automated photoconversion of specific cells transduced with sgRNA libraries based on nucleus size [75] or protein translocation [76], followed by FACS isolation of photo-converted cells and sequencing for sgRNA enrichment. Vale et al screened~3000 genes for their effects on nucleus size, whereas Youle et al…”
Section: High-throughput Screening With Neuronal Cell Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%