2021
DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01278-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High concurrent validity between digital and analogue algometers to measure pressure pain thresholds in healthy participants and people with migraine: a cross-sectional study

Abstract: Background Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) are commonly assessed to quantify mechanical sensitivity in various conditions, including migraine. Digital and analogue algometers are used, but the concurrent validity between these algometers is unknown. Therefore, we assessed the concurrent validity between a digital and analogue algometer to determine PPTs in healthy participants and people with migraine. Methods Twenty-six healthy participants and tw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One systematic review revealed that no significant associations were found between PPT values in the cranio-cervical sites, and headache characteristics such as frequency, duration, or intensity. The increased sensitivity of cranio-cervical sites supports the neurophysiological model of sensitization in migraine and chronic TTH [ 51 ]. In addition, no association between PPT values and other variables could be explained due to the methods used in the study (mechanical device rather than electronic) [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…One systematic review revealed that no significant associations were found between PPT values in the cranio-cervical sites, and headache characteristics such as frequency, duration, or intensity. The increased sensitivity of cranio-cervical sites supports the neurophysiological model of sensitization in migraine and chronic TTH [ 51 ]. In addition, no association between PPT values and other variables could be explained due to the methods used in the study (mechanical device rather than electronic) [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The PPTs were assessed with the Somedic algometer with a 1 cm 2 probe and are expressed in kPa/cm 2 . This algometer has excellent construct validity and high intra-rater reliability in people with migraine [ 25 ]. This was conducted by examiner 1 (E.V.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participant had to push the button of a hand-held switch. Once the participant pushed the button, the recorded value on the display of the algometer was noted [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICC values of intrarater reliability are ranged from 0.89 to 0.96 in people with migraine. 16 The intervention protocols were performed by a physiotherapist. Facial proprioceptive facilitation techniques were applied to the patients in the study group (Group 1) and CTM was applied to the patients in the control group (Group 2).…”
Section: Measurement Tool and Treatment Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%