“…Top-down synthetic methods excelled at producing LM nanostructures with high stoichiometric fidelity and suppressing undesirable phase segregation in LM nanoalloys in comparison to bottom-up methods . Moreover, conducting top-down approaches were energy-saving, simple, and straightforward without exploiting high temperature, expensive chemicals, and air/moisture-sensitive Schlenk line, as required by bottom-up approaches. − Therefore, a few top-down strategies, such as mechanical agitation, microfluidics, and ultrasonication, were developed to fabricate LM nanomaterials or LM–polymer hybrids. , These preparation strategies were primarily based on common rationale that the introduced external mechanical force shattered bulk LM into microdroplets/nanodroplets (i.e., microparticles/nanoparticles) during nanoparticle formation or mixing with polymers to fabricate mechanically robust and stretchable composites with targeted thermal and electrical conductivity. − However, external mechanical force usually resulted in irregularly shaped microparticles embedded in polymer matrices with inhomogeneous properties due to anisotropic distribution of LM. Uneven distribution of LM was attributed to the substantial surface tension of LM and surface chemistry discrepancy between LM and polymer matrices. , Recently, mechanical mixing in the presence of the surface stabilizing molecules was proposed to obtain LM nanostructures with improved morphology and homogeneity .…”