2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10884-022-10214-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Codimension Bifurcations of a Predator–Prey System with Generalized Holling Type III Functional Response and Allee Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Case (II)(ii.1): It is obvious that E * (x * , y * ) is a cusp of codimension 3 if B 31 ̸ = 0 ( [1,2,13,20,25]).…”
Section: Case (Ii)(ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case (II)(ii.1): It is obvious that E * (x * , y * ) is a cusp of codimension 3 if B 31 ̸ = 0 ( [1,2,13,20,25]).…”
Section: Case (Ii)(ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation of codimension three can occur for system (2), and the Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation set of the original system in a small neighborhood of (α, δ, γ) = (α BT , δ BT , γ BT ) is homeomorphic to that of system (18) in a small neighborhood of (ϵ 1 , ϵ 2 , ϵ 3 ) = (0, 0, 0), which is explored in [15]. See Figure 6 for details [4]. In order to have a deeper understanding of the dynamical behavior of the original system, we use the software package Matcont to give bifurcation diagrams for system (2) with respect to the original perturbation parameters in Figure 7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At point C, there are a stable homoclinic loop and a weak focus of order 1 whose first focus quantity is positive. Adapted from [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%