2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-cadence observations and variable spin behaviour of magnetar Swift J1818.0−1607 after its outburst

Abstract: We report on multi-frequency radio observations of the new magnetar Swift J1818.0−1607, following it for more than one month with high cadence. The observations commenced less than 35 hours after its registered first outburst. We obtained timing, polarisation and spectral information. Swift J1818.0−1607 has an unusually steep spectrum for a radio emitting magnetar and also has a relatively narrow and simple pulse profile. The position angle swing of the polarisation is flat over the pulse profile, possibly sug… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
9
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On session 3 (MJD 58490; 2019-01-09), the intensity at 7.6 GHz is not brighter than the previous unlike the similar flux changes between 1.52 GHz and 2.3 GHz. The time-variable spectral indices are rather common for radio magnetars (e.g., Anderson et al 2012;Pennucci et al 2015;Champion et al 2020), thus this would reflect a typical behavior of magnetar radio emission. Otherwise, it may suggest that there is a time lag in daily variations between low and high frequencies or that the flux variation includes narrow-band behaviors, which are not easy to be studied due to the strong variability.…”
Section: Flux Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On session 3 (MJD 58490; 2019-01-09), the intensity at 7.6 GHz is not brighter than the previous unlike the similar flux changes between 1.52 GHz and 2.3 GHz. The time-variable spectral indices are rather common for radio magnetars (e.g., Anderson et al 2012;Pennucci et al 2015;Champion et al 2020), thus this would reflect a typical behavior of magnetar radio emission. Otherwise, it may suggest that there is a time lag in daily variations between low and high frequencies or that the flux variation includes narrow-band behaviors, which are not easy to be studied due to the strong variability.…”
Section: Flux Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limiting the search to papers published in 2020, fifteen papers were returned by ADS, of which eleven employed SISH. Of these, seven papers used a value of β = −2.55 (Bilous et al 2020;Bondonneau et al 2020;Champion et al 2020;Chawla et al 2020;van Leeuwen et al 2020;Parent et al 2020;Tan et al 2020), three papers used β = −2.6 (Agarwal et al 2020;Basu et al 2020;Oostrum et al 2020), and one paper used β = −2.5 (Good et al 2020).…”
Section: Use Of Frequency-scaled Haslam Maps In Frb Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The progress of astrometry of Swift J1818.0−1607 Swift J1818.0−1607 is the fifth discovered radio-bright (Karuppusamy et al 2020) magnetar (GCN circular 27373), which is also the hitherto fastest-spinning magnetar with a spin period of 1.4 s (Enoto et al 2020). Its short spin period and high spindown rate correspond to a characteristic age of around 500 yr (Champion et al 2020), implying its great youth. Right after the radio detection of Swift J1818.0−1607, we launched an astrometric campaign of the magnetar using the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%