High‐ but not low‐intensity light leads to oxidative stress and quality loss of cold‐stored baby leaf spinach

Abstract

BACKGROUND Quality management in the fresh produce industry is an important issue. Spinach is exposed to various adverse conditions (temperature, light, etc.) within the supply chain. The present experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of light conditions (dark, low‐intensity light (LL) and high‐intensity light (HL)) and photoperiod (6 h HL and 18 h dark) on the quality changes of cold‐stored spinach. RESULTS HL exposure resulted in oxidative stress, causing tissue damage and quality loss as evidenced by increased membrane damage and water loss. The content of total ascorbic acid was reduced under HL conditions. On the other hand, storage of spinach under LL conditions gave promising results, as nutritional quality was not reduced, while texture maintenance was improved. No significant differences, with the exception of nutritional quality, were found between spinach leaves stored under continuous (24 h) low‐intensity light (30–35 µmol m−2 s−1) and their counterparts stored under the same light integral over 6 h (130–140 µmol m−2 s−1). CONCLUSION LL extended the shelf‐life of spinach. The amount of light received by the leaves was the key factor affecting produce quality. Light intensity, however, has to be low enough not to cause excess oxidative stress and lead to accelerated senescence. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry

Application of Light‐Emitting Diodes in Food Production, Postharvest Preservation, and Microbiological Food Safety

“…However, implementing an effective treatment is challenging as the optimal delivery of light depends on the intensity, spectral composition, and duration or photoperiod considerations (Noodén and Schneider ). Excessive administration of light at a low temperature could lead to photo‐oxidative stress and lower postharvest quality (Glowacz and others ).…”

“…However, less recognition is given to its usefulness in other aspects of food processing. It is now understood that low quantities of light can maintain the postharvest quality of crops by mitigating senescence, and improving phytochemical and nutrient content in several species (Costa and others ; Braidot and others ; Glowacz and others ; Pogson and Morris ). The sterilizing capabilities of ultraviolet (UV) radiation are well known, yet visible light has been shown to have bactericidal effects under certain conditions, hence playing a role in food safety.…”

An Overview of LEDs’ Effects on the Production of Bioactive Compounds and Crop Quality

“…Various studies have demonstrated that a controlled amount of light improves the postharvest quality and shelf-life of crops, by inducing nutrients and bioactive compounds production ( Figure 1 ) [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Bioactive compounds in plants are known as primary or secondary metabolites, and give aroma, color, and taste to the plants [ 8 ].…”

Blue Light Does Not Affect Fruit Quality or Disease Development on Ripe Blueberry Fruit During Postharvest Cold Storage

“…Multiple studies have demonstrated the effect of light on delaying senescence and extending shelf-life in green leafy vegetables [21][22][23]41]. In lettuce, blue light increased vitamin C and polyphenolic content during storage without affecting pH and moisture content [42].…”

“…For example, exposure to low light intensity can delay senescence and improve postharvest storage in basil, lettuce and spinach compared with storage in complete darkness. Low light intensity retarded the degradation of pigments such as chlorophyll and carotenoids, increased ATP levels and reduced senescence-associated symptoms [21][22][23].…”