2012
DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High biomass yield energy sorghum: developing a genetic model for C4 grass bioenergy crops

Abstract: A first‐generation energy sorghum hybrid with enhanced photoperiod sensitivity and long growth duration accumulated more than twice as much biomass as grain sorghum. The energy sorghum produced more leaves (~45 vs 17–20), longer stems (~4 vs 1.5 meters) and had a higher stem‐to‐leaf biomass ratio than grain sorghum. At the end of the season, energy sorghum stems represented 83% of the plant's shoot biomass. The greater biomass accumulation was due to longer growth duration, a higher leaf area index, greater ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
126
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
12
126
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Energy sorghum and grain sorghum canopies close 60-75 days after seedling emergence, approximately when grain sorghum reaches anthesis. In contrast, energy sorghum remains vegetative following canopy closure for an additional 140 days, and plants retain a whorl of developing leaves at the top of the canopy that have very small angles (Olson et al 2012). In grain sorghum, from anthesis through grain maturity, canopies lack the whorl of leaves with small angles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Energy sorghum and grain sorghum canopies close 60-75 days after seedling emergence, approximately when grain sorghum reaches anthesis. In contrast, energy sorghum remains vegetative following canopy closure for an additional 140 days, and plants retain a whorl of developing leaves at the top of the canopy that have very small angles (Olson et al 2012). In grain sorghum, from anthesis through grain maturity, canopies lack the whorl of leaves with small angles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the virtual sorghum and lighting in Figure 2A, the conversion efficiency of the canopy with smaller leaf angles is predicted to be 1.0436 of the conversion efficiency of the canopy with large leaf angles. If we further assume that (1) the 4% gain in conversion efficiency is realized for 4 hr (midday) per 14-hr day and (2) the effect calculated is applicable to the duration of vegetative closedcanopy growth, then given a bioenergy sorghum growing season where 140 days are in the vegetative closed canopy of its 200-day growing season (Olson et al 2012), we predict an overall increase of 3% conversion efficiency over the entire growing season. Thus, under these conditions, the canopy with smaller leaf angles has the potential to accumulate 3% more biomass than the canopy with large leaf angles.…”
Section: Leaf Angle Affects Vertical Light Distribution In Sorghum Camentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modeling of light interception by crop canopies indicates that current genotypes often intercept an excess of light at the top of the canopy (Zhu et al, 2010;Drewry et al, 2014). Energy sorghum hybrids tiller to a greater extent than grain sorghum genotypes, often producing canopies with excess leaf area index (greater than 7; Olson et al, 2012). A more optimal distribution of light interception could be achieved by growing energy sorghum with reduced propensity for tillering at lower plant density with leaves having reduced leaf angles (Truong et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each seed parent was hybridized using the pollinator line R07007. R07007 is a photoperiod insensitive breeding line in the Texas AgriLife Research program that when hybridized to standard seed parents (such as Tx378, Tx623 and Tx631) produces a photoperiod sensitive hybrid based on epistatic genetic interactions at specific maturity loci [28,29]. Thus a total of nine hybrids, representing three genetically distinct inbreds and three distinct CMS were included in the agronomic analyses.…”
Section: Hybrid Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%