2017
DOI: 10.3390/su9030334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Biodiversity of Green Infrastructure Does Not Contribute to Recreational Ecosystem Services

Abstract: Urban lakes, especially those of natural origin, provide ecosystem services, recreation being one of the most important and highly valued by city dwellers. Fulfilling the needs of city residents to relax and have contact with nature has become a priority in urbanized areas and has been proven to positively affect people's health and well-being. The recreational potential of water bodies was identified to be the most important aspect of ecosystem services to the residents of the neighboring areas. An assessment… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gobster discovered that the spatial configurations of people's preferences were less ecological [44]. One study found that no correlation between biodiversity (based on number of plant species) and the duration of real time spent by the citizens at the green spaces was found [45]. These studies confirmed the findings of this present study.…”
Section: The More Natural Not Necessarily the Better: The Decompresssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Gobster discovered that the spatial configurations of people's preferences were less ecological [44]. One study found that no correlation between biodiversity (based on number of plant species) and the duration of real time spent by the citizens at the green spaces was found [45]. These studies confirmed the findings of this present study.…”
Section: The More Natural Not Necessarily the Better: The Decompresssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Instead, it should be seen as an indication of a certain level of awareness of the opportunities to include such tools in planning procedures. The planning tools have different names throughout Europe, such as biotope area factor, green space factor, blue green area factor, max density of built-up area, coefficient of vegetation area, or green-area-per-capita factor [51,52]. These tools are used in varying forms and to a varying degree in the different countries.…”
Section: Georeferenced Information On Protected Areas and Its Use In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no consideration of the temporal variability of functions in individual parts of the system or potential conflicts between functions, which is a challenge for multifunctional planning [76]. In the planned GI WFA system, conflicts could arise between ecological and social functions, especially with the intensive use of high-quality nature areas [77]. Issues related to the multifunctionality of the GI WFA system constitute an area for further work at the local level.…”
Section: Planning Of the Gi Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%