2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2006.11.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High anterior cervical approach to the upper cervical spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…VCP may be due to sectioning or retraction injury of the RLN, retraction of the esophagus with reduced perfusion, 21 direct pharyngeal or esophageal pressure, 22 hypoglossal nerve injury, 35 or alteration in C2-7 angle. 36,47 Injury to the superior laryngeal nerve (particularly in high approaches) is also a cited cause, and although not well documented in the ACDF literature, is a well-known cause of dysphagia following oncological surgery of the neck.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VCP may be due to sectioning or retraction injury of the RLN, retraction of the esophagus with reduced perfusion, 21 direct pharyngeal or esophageal pressure, 22 hypoglossal nerve injury, 35 or alteration in C2-7 angle. 36,47 Injury to the superior laryngeal nerve (particularly in high approaches) is also a cited cause, and although not well documented in the ACDF literature, is a well-known cause of dysphagia following oncological surgery of the neck.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park et al 106 described a prevascular extraoral retropharyngeal approach to the upper cervical spine, including a case of C2-4 OPLL. They reported that this approach is relatively safe.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dysphagia and Dysphonia are known complications after anterior cervical spine procedures Dysphagia could be secondary to the injury of superior 25 , recurrent laryngeal nerve 26 , hypoglossal 27 and glossopharyngeal nerve 25 . The incidence of this complication varies from 2 to 50 % depending on the type of study and evaluation methodology 28,29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%