High ankle brachial index predicts high risk of cardiovascular events amongst people with peripheral artery disease

Abstract

Ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) is commonly measured in people referred to vascular specialists. This study aimed to assess the association of high ABPI (≥ 1.4) with cardiovascular events in people with peripheral artery disease (PAD). 1533 participants with PAD diagnosed by a vascular specialist were prospectively recruited from four out-patient clinics in Australia. ABPI was measured at recruitment and the occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or cardiovascular death (major cardiovascular events; MACE) and any amputation were recorded over a median (inter-quartile range) follow-up of 3.3 (1.0–7.1) years. The association of high, compared to normal, low (0.5–0.9) or very low (<0.5), ABPI with clinical events was estimated using Cox proportional hazard analyses, adjusting for traditional risk factors and reported as hazard ratio with 95% confidence intervals. 596 (38.9%), 676 (44.1%), 157 (10.2%) and 104 (6.8%) participants had normal, low, very low and high ABPI, respectively. Participants with high ABPI had increased risk of MACE, MI and death by comparison to those with either normal ABPI [1.69 (1.07, 2.65), 1.93 (1.07, 3.46) and 1.67 (1.09, 2.56)] or either low or very low ABPI [1.51 (1.02, 2.23), 1.92 (1.16, 3.19) and 1.47 (1.02, 2.14)] after adjusting for other risk factors. Findings were similar in a sensitivity analysis excluding people with ABPI only measured in one leg (n = 120). Participants with high ABPI also had an increased risk of MACE and MI compared to those with very low ABPI alone. High ABPI is a strong indicator of excess risk of cardiovascular events amongst people with PAD.

Peripheral Artery Disease among a High-Risk Asian Population with Ischaemic Stroke, Cardiovascular Disease, or Diabetes Mellitus

“…PAD was diagnosed if ABI was ≤0.9 in either limb. There are recommendations to use ABI > 1.4 [23,24] or the toe-brachial index, especially among those with diabetes mellitus [17,25], to diagnose PAD. However, these parameters and indices were not used in the analysis of this study so as to allow comparisons of our findings with other studies discussed in this paper, as they largely used ABI < 0.9 to diagnose PAD.…”