2003
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m307683200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Affinity Agonistic Metal Ion Binding Sites within the Melanocortin 4 Receptor Illustrate Conformational Change of Transmembrane Region 3

Abstract: We created a molecular model of the human melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) and introduced a series of His residues into the receptor protein to form metal ion binding sites. We were able to insert micromolar affinity binding sites for zinc between transmembrane region (TM) 2 and TM3 where the metal ion alone was able to activate this peptide binding G-protein-coupled receptor. The exact conformation of the metal ion interactions allowed us to predict the orientation of the helices, and remodeling of the receptor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The binding method has been very reliable and reproducible for a long period in the lab independent of the cell type used. We have compared the two cell types, COS (CV Origin SV 40) and HEK293-EBNA, several times on our lab, and found that they give the same results in binding studies (Ringholm et al, 2002;Lagerströ m et al, 2003). The Val92Met mutant had, however, clearly lower affinity to a-MSH (about 100-fold) comparing to the wild-type receptor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The binding method has been very reliable and reproducible for a long period in the lab independent of the cell type used. We have compared the two cell types, COS (CV Origin SV 40) and HEK293-EBNA, several times on our lab, and found that they give the same results in binding studies (Ringholm et al, 2002;Lagerströ m et al, 2003). The Val92Met mutant had, however, clearly lower affinity to a-MSH (about 100-fold) comparing to the wild-type receptor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To improve the accuracy of the modeling and to avoid the common modeling errors related to the structural misalignment and erroneous loop modeling (30,49), we used model refinement by satisfying structural restraints (31). The restraints were derived not only from the structural templates (1gzm for the receptor and 1hyk and 1mr0 for the ligand) but also from mutagenesis experiments demonstrating the formation of Zn 2+ -binding sites in MCRs (39)(40)(41)44). The native and non-natural disulfide bonds, which can be formed in wildtype or mutant receptors, provide the additional structural restrains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use only the C b -C b constraint because the data were obtained either for GPCRs other than rhodopsin [52][53][54][55] or for engineered sites in rhodopsin [56]. We use C b -C b distance >8.5 Å if the Zinc binding site blocks activation and 6.5…”
Section: Zinc Binding Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%