2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2018.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High accuracy proton relative stopping power measurement

Abstract: Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting RSP was 1.025 ± 0.001 (mean and one standard deviation testing three gel batches) respectively. According to van Abbema et al 26 . the uncertainty in the determination of the RSP based on length and range measurement is below 0.4%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting RSP was 1.025 ± 0.001 (mean and one standard deviation testing three gel batches) respectively. According to van Abbema et al 26 . the uncertainty in the determination of the RSP based on length and range measurement is below 0.4%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current radiation physics research by both internal and external users focuses on near-real-time in vivo range verification in particle therapy [93,94] and various aspects of dosimetry, including characterization of the LET distribution of particle beams [95] and tissue relative stopping powers [96].…”
Section: Kvi-cartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An energy-specific calibration curve was constructed for the imaging system to calculate the WET of any phantom being imaged. The calibration curve was plotted by stacking 8 plastic water slabs of known physical thicknesses (5,10,20,40,60,80, 100, and 110 mm) in front of the scintillator volume. The slabs were positioned in the x-y plane (see figure 1) such that their thicknesses were along the z-axis.…”
Section: Calibration Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches such as a dual-energy CT technique for generating SPR distributions have been proposed as an alternative to the x-ray CT-based treatment planning methods (Yang et al 2010). Work on dual-energy CT method has been published using both phantoms (Bourque et al 2014, Hunemohr et al 2014, van Abbema et al 2018 as well as through clinical studies (Wohlfahrt et al 2017, Taasti andJensen 2018). Dualenergy CT is a promising technology with the potential to decrease proton range uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%