2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High accuracy FIONA–AFM hybrid imaging

Abstract: Multi-protein complexes are ubiquitous and play essential roles in many biological mechanisms. Single molecule imaging techniques such as electron microscopy (EM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) are powerful methods for characterizing the structural properties of multi-protein and multi-protein–DNA complexes. However, a significant limitation to these techniques is the ability to distinguish different proteins from one another. Here, we combine high resolution fluorescence microscopy and AFM (FIONA–AFM) to a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is limited because identification of specific proteins in heterogeneous assemblies depends on distinct structural features, whereas most proteins have a similar globular shape. Molecular recognition in high-resolution SFM images can be achieved by combining SFM with a fluorescence microscope capable of single-fluorescence detection (4)(5)(6). By labeling individual proteins or single DNA molecules, it is possible to distinguish the position of different components in a highly resolved complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is limited because identification of specific proteins in heterogeneous assemblies depends on distinct structural features, whereas most proteins have a similar globular shape. Molecular recognition in high-resolution SFM images can be achieved by combining SFM with a fluorescence microscope capable of single-fluorescence detection (4)(5)(6). By labeling individual proteins or single DNA molecules, it is possible to distinguish the position of different components in a highly resolved complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This speed is approximately nine times faster than CPU correlation (averagely 140.5630.3 s per correlation), and about eleven times higher than manual operation (averagely 174.9656.4 s per correlation). The average drift rate of our nanomanipulation set-up was 1.24 nm s 21 , determined with the method we previously reported. 29 With GPUaccelerated ASIFT, a 15.3 s computation time translates to SEM image drift of ,19 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These landmarks can be easily identified in images captured under different modes of microscopy (e.g., SEM and fluorescence). [18][19][20][21] However, our DNA extraction task must be conducted under specific SEM imaging conditions with limited imaging resolution, imposed by the necessity of preserving the biochemical integrity of the sample. Such poor imaging conditions make the identification of nanometer-sized fiducial marks difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid methods combine AFM with fluorescence microscopy (Fronczek et al, 2011; Sanchez, Kanaar, & Wyman, 2010; Sanchez, Kertokalio, van Rossum-Fikkert, Kanaar, & Wyman, 2013). These techniques overcome a serious limitation of AFM (and electron microscopy) to distinguish different proteins.…”
Section: Complementary Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%