2006
DOI: 10.1364/ol.31.001979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-accuracy determination of water vapor refractivity by length interferometry

Abstract: Humidity is the most problematic parameter for the accurate determination of the refractive index of air. Besides the fact that the humidity measurement can be limiting, the existing empirical equations for the refractive index of moist air are either restricted to 20 degrees C or are based on insufficient knowledge of the refractivity of water vapor. To overcome this problem, a new kind of measurement method for the refractivity of water vapor is suggested that is based on the accurate measurement of the abso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower frequency Debye response is considered to be defined by the frequency half-width of f 1/2 = 2.0 THz. This assumption gives a monotonically decreasing refractivity from 70 x 10 −6 at zero frequency to 0.8 x 70 x 10 −6 at 1.0 THz, which is consistent with the previous measurements [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], and the previous Debye theory approach [16,17]. However, this value of f 1/2 = 2.0 THz is exceptionally large compared to the collision frequency of 3.5 GHz [12] for the water rotational lines at similar conditions of atmospheric pressure, water vapor density and temperature.…”
Section: Microwave and Mm-wave Debye Theory Approachsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lower frequency Debye response is considered to be defined by the frequency half-width of f 1/2 = 2.0 THz. This assumption gives a monotonically decreasing refractivity from 70 x 10 −6 at zero frequency to 0.8 x 70 x 10 −6 at 1.0 THz, which is consistent with the previous measurements [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], and the previous Debye theory approach [16,17]. However, this value of f 1/2 = 2.0 THz is exceptionally large compared to the collision frequency of 3.5 GHz [12] for the water rotational lines at similar conditions of atmospheric pressure, water vapor density and temperature.…”
Section: Microwave and Mm-wave Debye Theory Approachsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Another infrared measurement at 3.4 µm gave the refractivity of 2.87 x 10 −6 at 20 °C and 10 mm Hg (9.9 g/m 3 ) [6]. Optical measurements over the range of 780 to 532 nm gave (n-1) of 2.3 x 10 −6 at 20 °C with 1000 Pa (7.4 g/m 3 ) [8]; scaling this value to 1333 Pa (10 mm Hg) (9.9 g/m 3 ) gives (n-1) = 3.07 x 10 −6 .…”
Section: Experimental Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A lot of effort has been put into evaluation of other effects such as content of various gases in air, especially CO 2 [28]. Humidity, particularly the content of water vapor, has been investigated in [29,30]. The study of these effects resulted in inverse approaches where measurement of the refractive index of air became the means of determining another quantity, such as temperature [31] or air density and moisture [32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of effort has been put into evaluation of other effects such as content of various gasses in air, especially CO 2 [26]. Humidity, particularly the content of water vapor has been investigated in [27,28]. The study of these effects resulted in inverse approaches where measurement of the refractive index of air became the means of determining of another quantity, such as temperature [29] or air density and moisture [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%