2018
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2018.2806894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Accuracy Automatic Calibration of Resolver Signals via Two-Step Gradient Estimators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Group 1: The original signals; Group 2: The signals denoised by the low-pass Butterworth filter; Group 3: The signals denoised by the DWT based filter; Group 4: The signals denoised by the DWT-SVD based filter. Next, in order to verify the influence of the filter on the calibration accuracy, the imperfect parameters of the above signals are estimated by an automatic calibration algorithm based on two-step gradient estimators in Reference [10]. The simulation and experimental results are analyzed as follows.…”
Section: Simulation and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Group 1: The original signals; Group 2: The signals denoised by the low-pass Butterworth filter; Group 3: The signals denoised by the DWT based filter; Group 4: The signals denoised by the DWT-SVD based filter. Next, in order to verify the influence of the filter on the calibration accuracy, the imperfect parameters of the above signals are estimated by an automatic calibration algorithm based on two-step gradient estimators in Reference [10]. The simulation and experimental results are analyzed as follows.…”
Section: Simulation and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the strong coupling between parameters and the angular velocity in the mathematical model was undesired because the improvement of the calibration accuracy depended on the angular frequency. Therefore, an improved algorithm based on two-step gradient estimators was presented to decouple them [10]. Owing to the more accurate information of angular velocity, the calibration accuracy was further improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digital signals will be uploaded to the upper computer and applied with the same three ATO methods used in simulation results. It is noteworthy that, using the HIL method, the actual value of angular position can be known to evaluate error suppression performance of the RDC, whereas a practical resolver fails to provide this information [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this scheme, an ellipse fitting method [7] and a parameter identification algorithm [1,8] based on gradient descent were developed. On this basis, Gao [9,10] proposed iterative algorithms for self-calibration, while Wu et al [11] applied the technology detailed in [12] to design a two-step gradient estimator and realize online parameter self-calibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the processing of error signals, Hyun et al [15] proposed an adaptive digital demodulation method for a sinusoidal encoder signal, and Xiujun et al [16] developed a piecewise calibration technique that provided a good trade-off between microcontroller memory size and algorithm complexity. The scheme in [11] was also a self-calibration method implemented in hardware. Simpler signal processing algorithms generally consume fewer hardware resources, motivating the solution proposed in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%