2020
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08557-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HiggsBounds-5: testing Higgs sectors in the LHC 13 TeV Era

Abstract: We describe recent developments of the public computer code . In particular, these include the incorporation of LHC Higgs search results from Run 2 at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, and an updated and extended framework for the theoretical input that accounts for improved Higgs cross section and branching ratio predictions and new search channels. We furthermore discuss an improved method used in to approximately reconstruct the exclusion likelihood for LHC searches for non-standard Higgs bosons decaying … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
147
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 197 publications
(157 reference statements)
3
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before ending our discussion of the CSI O(N )-symmetric models, it is also important to comment on the experimental status of the parameter points we have considered. We have verified using HiggsBounds [91][92][93][94][95] that the points allowed by under the theoretical criteria discussed above are also allowed from the point of view of collider searches. The…”
Section: Jhep03(2021)297mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Before ending our discussion of the CSI O(N )-symmetric models, it is also important to comment on the experimental status of the parameter points we have considered. We have verified using HiggsBounds [91][92][93][94][95] that the points allowed by under the theoretical criteria discussed above are also allowed from the point of view of collider searches. The…”
Section: Jhep03(2021)297mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…One of them is B → X s γ [96][97][98][99][100], which forces m H ± > 580 GeV (for the Type II model); the constraints from R b are also included [96,101]; concerning the different signals for the SM-like Higgs boson, we required compatibility with the fits presented in ref. [102], whereas exclusion bounds from additional Higgs searches are taken into account via HiggsBounds5 [103]. We also considered experiments that restrict the amount of CP violation of the C2HDM; we used the most stringent limit on the electron EDM, |d e | < 1.1 × 10 −29 e cm at 90% confidence level, provided by the ACME collaboration [104].…”
Section: Computational Tools and Simulation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constraints include the theoretical ones like the requirements of non-tachyonic particle spectrum, absence of an unphysical global minimum and that of Landau poles in various Yukawa-type couplings like 'λ', 'κ', y t and y b and the experimental ones from the flavor sector and those coming from collider experiments like the LEP, Tevatron and the LHC. In addition, up-to-date constraints pertaining to the observed Higgs sector are checked via dedicated packages like HiggsBounds-v5.4.0 [121][122][123] and HiggsSignals-v2.3.0 [124,125] and the mass of the SM-like Higgs boson is considered within the range 122 GeV < m h SM < 128 GeV to account for the uncertainties in its theoretical estimates. However, with the mass of the smuons (and, in general, of all the sfermions) set to be in the multi-TeV domain, we do not attempt to reproduce the purported discrepancy between the theoretically predicted and the experimentally measured values of muon anomalous magnetic moment JHEP04(2021)122…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%