2008
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0802.3257
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higgs Mass Bounds, Type II SeeSaw and LHC

Ilia Gogoladze,
Nobuchika Okada,
Qaisar Shafi

Abstract: In type II seesaw utilized to explain the observed neutrino masses and mixings, one extends the Standard Model (SM) by introducing scalar fields which transform as a triplet under the electroweak gauge symmetry. New scalar couplings involving the Higgs doublet then appear and, as we show, these have important implications for the Higgs boson mass bounds obtained using vacuum stability and perturbativity arguments. We identify, in particular, regions of the parameter space which permit the SM Higgs boson to be … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we further take the region of |ξ| 10 −2 in our analysis, some of the effects with a largest possible value of ξ [8,16] can be safely neglected.…”
Section: Higgs Couplings In Type II Seesawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we further take the region of |ξ| 10 −2 in our analysis, some of the effects with a largest possible value of ξ [8,16] can be safely neglected.…”
Section: Higgs Couplings In Type II Seesawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our model has important implications for the SM Higgs boson mass. As shown in [23], the SM Higgs boson mass bounds obtained from imposing vacuum stability and perturbativity of the quartic Higgs coupling can be dramatically altered in the presence of type II seesaw. In particular, the Higgs boson mass window with type II seesaw can encompass mass regions otherwise not allowed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…will alter the ρ-parameters from the SM prediction ρ ≈ 1, at tree level and hence will get a strong constraint from the current precision data [44].…”
Section: Type-ii Seesawmentioning
confidence: 99%