2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.92.075032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higgs bosons in heavy supersymmetry with an intermediatemA

Abstract: The minimal supersymmetric standard model leads to precise predictions of the properties of the light Higgs boson degrees of freedom that depend on only a few relevant supersymmetry breaking parameters. In particular, there is an upper bound on the mass of the lightest neutral Higgs boson, which for a supersymmetric spectrum of the order of a TeV is barely above the one of the Higgs resonance recently observed at the LHC. This bound can be raised by considering a heavier supersymmetric spectrum, relaxing the t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
169
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
4
169
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 When the SUSY scale is very large, additional checks on the value of m h are required at low tan β, for which a comparison with an effective field theory calculation is necessary. Results of such an analysis [47,48] indicate that, even in such heavy-M SU SY scenarios, the predictions of the hMSSM agree within a few percent with the exact results for m H , α and λ Hhh , as long as the condition µX t /M 2 SU SY 1 is satisfied. For the purposes of our N = 2 study here, which is restricted to the Higgs sector, we follow the philosophy proposed in [42][43][44][45][46], in which the hMSSM scenario was introduced to discuss the N = 1 MSSM Higgs sector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…5 When the SUSY scale is very large, additional checks on the value of m h are required at low tan β, for which a comparison with an effective field theory calculation is necessary. Results of such an analysis [47,48] indicate that, even in such heavy-M SU SY scenarios, the predictions of the hMSSM agree within a few percent with the exact results for m H , α and λ Hhh , as long as the condition µX t /M 2 SU SY 1 is satisfied. For the purposes of our N = 2 study here, which is restricted to the Higgs sector, we follow the philosophy proposed in [42][43][44][45][46], in which the hMSSM scenario was introduced to discuss the N = 1 MSSM Higgs sector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Similarly, also a general Two-Higgs-Doublet-Model was already considered as low energy limit of the MSSM [21][22][23]. Finally, since several years Split-SUSY variants of the MSSM have become more and more popular in which the coloured SUSY particles are integrated out [15][16][17][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Here we use α f = (Y f ) 2 /(4π), with Y f denoting the fermion Yukawa coupling.) These corrections, together with a resummation of leading and subleading logarithms from the top/scalar top sector [40] (see also [41,42] for more details on this type of approach), a resummation of leading contributions from the bottom/scalar bottom sector [38,39,[43][44][45][46] (see also [47,48]) and momentum-dependent two-loop contributions [49,50] (see also [51]) are included in the public code FeynHiggs [32,40,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. A (nearly) full two-loop EP calculation, including even the leading three-loop corrections, has also been published [59,60], which is, however, not publicly available as a computer code.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%