High‐Performance Computing 2005
DOI: 10.1002/0471732710.ch31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HIERAS: A DHT‐Based Hierarchical P2P Routing Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RELATED WORK The application of multi-level structures on DHTs has attracted the attention of many researchers who attempted to combine the scalability characteristics of both hierarchical designs and DHTs, so as to further improve overlay routing performance and/or achieve administrative autonomy. In the HIERAS [36] and Coral [37] schemes, overlay nodes 8 Similar results where derived for different time-out and failure rate values.…”
Section: ) Impact Of Churnsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…RELATED WORK The application of multi-level structures on DHTs has attracted the attention of many researchers who attempted to combine the scalability characteristics of both hierarchical designs and DHTs, so as to further improve overlay routing performance and/or achieve administrative autonomy. In the HIERAS [36] and Coral [37] schemes, overlay nodes 8 Similar results where derived for different time-out and failure rate values.…”
Section: ) Impact Of Churnsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The concept of P2P has been defined in multiple different ways in the literature, for example by Androutsellis-Theotokis & Spinellis (2004), Xu et al (2003), Halepovic & Deters (2003) and Sakaryan & Unger (2004). In Koskela et al (2013), we have provided the following definition, which is based on the common properties of the different definitions found in the literature:…”
Section: P2p Networkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…departments within a university) or peer capabilities ("have" or "have not"). Systems with group structures such as Canon [9], Hieras [23], and Cyclone [2] use routing protocols which tend to route lookups as far as possible within one group before forwarding them on to a different group. While resource availability levels could be used to define groups, current approaches pose several problems: lookup routing would have to start in the (sparse) highest layers in order to relieve weaker nodes from routing responsibilities, thus compromising scalability; low level nodes would primarily maintain links within their group, i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%