2021
DOI: 10.1109/tcds.2020.3012278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchy Graph Convolution Network and Tree Classification for Epileptic Detection on Electroencephalography Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adjacency matrix W Rn×n of each mini‐epoch, representing the spatial correlation along with the channel signals XRn×M is one of the inputs of the ST‐GCN model shown in Figure 1a. In some studies on brain disorders based on GCN (Chen et al, 2020; Li, Liu, et al, 2021; Zeng et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2021; Zhao et al, 2021), the relationship of different channels of EEG is short of effective prior guidance and the adjacency matrix cannot ensure the utilisation of the coupling information between each channel. To address these issues, we first apply functional connectivity, which has been proven to be useful in AD classification, to construct the adaptive adjacency matrix to extract spatial coupling features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The adjacency matrix W Rn×n of each mini‐epoch, representing the spatial correlation along with the channel signals XRn×M is one of the inputs of the ST‐GCN model shown in Figure 1a. In some studies on brain disorders based on GCN (Chen et al, 2020; Li, Liu, et al, 2021; Zeng et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2021; Zhao et al, 2021), the relationship of different channels of EEG is short of effective prior guidance and the adjacency matrix cannot ensure the utilisation of the coupling information between each channel. To address these issues, we first apply functional connectivity, which has been proven to be useful in AD classification, to construct the adaptive adjacency matrix to extract spatial coupling features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building neural networks under the graph theory, graph convolutional neural networks (GCNs) have been developed specifically to handle highly multirelational graph data by jointly leveraging node‐specific sequential features and cross‐nodes topologically associative features in the graph domain (Gallicchio & Micheli, 2010 ; Gori et al, 2005 ; Scarselli et al, 2008 ; Sperduti & Starita, 1997 ). In recent 2 years, GCNs have been applied in the diagnoses of various brain disorders, such as children's ASD evaluation (Zhang et al, 2021 ), detection of epileptic (Zeng et al, 2020 ; Zhao et al, 2021 ), seizure prediction (Li, Liu, et al, 2021 ), and epilepsy classification (Chen et al, 2020 ). As far as we are concerned, there are no AD diagnostic approaches based on GCN‐related models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We overcome this challenge by learning the interdependency between the EEG electrodes as part of the training process. Recently, many graph based methods have been proposed for extracting spatio-temporal information from EEG signals [21,22,23,24]. However, most of these methods treat the graph network connections as static and do not learn the functional connectivities between the EEG electrodes as a part of the training process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these algorithms can not detect or extract complex EEG features, and they used to obtain general classification results. In recent years, deep learning methods have demonstrated its efficiency and flexibility for its excellent performance, especially Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) [18], Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) [19], and Graph Neural Network (GNN) [20]. After intensive exploration, attention mechanism has been successfully adapted to EEG emotion recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%