2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.05.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical ZIF-decorated nanoflower-covered 3-dimensional foam for enhanced catalytic reduction of nitrogen-containing contaminants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FT-IR and XPS results of the used catalyst (Figure B–D­(a 3 )) are almost consistent with the NaBH 4 – -treated sample, which implies the negligible influence of substrate or product on the catalyst upon the far excessive NaBH 4 , revealing the reconstruction of the catalyst involving LDH restoration and reduction of Pd 2+ to Pd 0 species by the strong reductant in the reaction solution. The presence of Co 3+ in the used sample (∼42.07%) suggests that Co 2+ might act as an electron donor for reducing 4-NP, which is consistent with the weak catalytic reduction activity of the supported derived sample CoAl­(O)/rGO-300 (2.38 × 10 –3 s –1 ). Thus, the high performance of the current catalysts is strongly related to the presence of Pd 0 species, the reducibility of Co 2+ species, and the synergistic interaction among Pd NCs, Co 2+ -OH (LDH), and rGO.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FT-IR and XPS results of the used catalyst (Figure B–D­(a 3 )) are almost consistent with the NaBH 4 – -treated sample, which implies the negligible influence of substrate or product on the catalyst upon the far excessive NaBH 4 , revealing the reconstruction of the catalyst involving LDH restoration and reduction of Pd 2+ to Pd 0 species by the strong reductant in the reaction solution. The presence of Co 3+ in the used sample (∼42.07%) suggests that Co 2+ might act as an electron donor for reducing 4-NP, which is consistent with the weak catalytic reduction activity of the supported derived sample CoAl­(O)/rGO-300 (2.38 × 10 –3 s –1 ). Thus, the high performance of the current catalysts is strongly related to the presence of Pd 0 species, the reducibility of Co 2+ species, and the synergistic interaction among Pd NCs, Co 2+ -OH (LDH), and rGO.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The FT-IR spectrum of the treated sample (Figure 9B(a 2 )) shows a new peak at ∼672 cm −1 assigned to the Co 3+ −O, 63 implying the transition from Co 2+ to Co 3+ in the catalyst during the reaction. As expected, the Pd 3d XPS spectrum of the treated sample (Figure 9C(a 2 )) only shows the peaks assigned to Pd 0 , possibly due to the reduction function that occurred on the interface between the NaBH 4 solution and nanosheet array-like Co 2+ -contained catalyst 0.17 65 which is consistent with the weak catalytic reduction activity of the supported derived sample CoAl(O)/rGO-300 (2.38 × 10 −3 s −1 ). Thus, the high performance of the current catalysts is strongly related to the presence of Pd 0 species, the reducibility of Co 2+ species, and the synergistic interaction among Pd NCs, Co 2+ -OH (LDH), and rGO.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Compared with the powder supports, the thin‐film supports (Scheme S1③) including the PAN‐Si membrane, 44 Cu foil, 45 PVDF membrane, 46 glass, 47 and cellulose paper, 48 and so on, are undoubtedly easier to recycle, but their lower specific surface area reduces the catalytically active sites of metal nanoparticles. Although the porous supports (Scheme S1④), for example, lignocellulose hydrogel, 49 Cu foam, 50 and TiO 2 scaffold 51 have higher active area than the thin‐film supports, most of their activity and stability are still far below expectations. Among the available supports, the Si nanowire array (Scheme S1⑤) is likely to be the best choice, due to the fact that it has all the advantages mentioned above, that is, high surface to volume ratio, strong metal‐support interactions, and easy to recycle, but drawback still exists regarding the costly, complicated, and low‐throughput preparation procedures 52 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 Compared with the powder supports, the thinfilm supports (Scheme S1③) including the PAN-Si membrane, 44 Cu foil, 45 PVDF membrane, 46 glass, 47 and cellulose paper, 48 and so on, are undoubtedly easier to recycle, but their lower specific surface area reduces the catalytically active sites of metal nanoparticles. Although the porous supports (Scheme S1④), for example, lignocellulose hydrogel, 49 Cu foam, 50 and TiO 2 scaffold 51 have higher active area than the thin-film supports, most of their activity and stability are still far below expectations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently, the transition metal Co can be expected to greatly modify the surface electronic structure of Cu species by forming electron-rich Cu species and the available Co 2+ /Co 3+ redox couple, , which may be extremely favorable to the electron transfer during the reaction upon much lower electronegativity of Co (1.88) than Cu (1.90) and stronger reducibility of the Co 2+ –OH (d 7 : t 2g 5 e g 2 ) group in alkaline media. Recently, several Cu–Co bimetallic catalysts with improved 4-NP reduction activity have been reported. ,, For example, Chu et al fabricated Cu/Co nanoparticles (15∼70 nm) doped with the N-containing carbon framework (NCF) through the bottle-around-a-ship method followed by high-temperature pyrolysis, exhibiting significantly improved 4-NP reduction catalytic activity than Co@NCF and Cu NPs, indicating the modifying effect of Co species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%