“…Compared with the powder supports, the thin‐film supports (Scheme S1③) including the PAN‐Si membrane, 44 Cu foil, 45 PVDF membrane, 46 glass, 47 and cellulose paper, 48 and so on, are undoubtedly easier to recycle, but their lower specific surface area reduces the catalytically active sites of metal nanoparticles. Although the porous supports (Scheme S1④), for example, lignocellulose hydrogel, 49 Cu foam, 50 and TiO 2 scaffold 51 have higher active area than the thin‐film supports, most of their activity and stability are still far below expectations. Among the available supports, the Si nanowire array (Scheme S1⑤) is likely to be the best choice, due to the fact that it has all the advantages mentioned above, that is, high surface to volume ratio, strong metal‐support interactions, and easy to recycle, but drawback still exists regarding the costly, complicated, and low‐throughput preparation procedures 52 .…”