2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.15.540878
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical syntax models of music predict theta power during music listening

Abstract: Linguistic research showed that the depth of syntactic embedding is reflected in brain theta power. Here, we test whether this also extends to non-linguistic stimuli, specifically music. We used a hierarchical model of musical syntax to continuously quantify two types of expert-annotated harmonic dependencies throughout a piece of Western classical music: prolongation and preparation. Prolongations can roughly be understood as a musical analogue to linguistic coordination between constituents that share the sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 213 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results support this perspective in the context of musical rhythms, enriching prior evidence that integrated representations of melodic and harmonic structure as a whole are formed during listening Koelsch et al, 2013;Martínez, 2018;Rohrmeier & Widdess, 2017) and that such representations are even revised retrospectively if necessary to ensure global coherence (Cecchetti et al, 2022). The non-local nature of the hypothesized dependencies further supports that such representations can be hierarchical rather than sequential (Rohrmeier & Pearce, 2018), consistently with prior evidence pertaining to pitch and tonal harmony (Dibben, 1994;Herff et al, 2021Herff et al, , 2023Koelsch et al, 2013;Martins, Gingras, Puig-Waldmueller, & Fitch, 2017;Serafine, Glassman, & Overbeeke, 1989). Note that this framework does not require, and the present results do not suggest, that the relationships underlying such representations are explicitly available to conscious awareness.…”
Section: Existence Of Rhythmic Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results support this perspective in the context of musical rhythms, enriching prior evidence that integrated representations of melodic and harmonic structure as a whole are formed during listening Koelsch et al, 2013;Martínez, 2018;Rohrmeier & Widdess, 2017) and that such representations are even revised retrospectively if necessary to ensure global coherence (Cecchetti et al, 2022). The non-local nature of the hypothesized dependencies further supports that such representations can be hierarchical rather than sequential (Rohrmeier & Pearce, 2018), consistently with prior evidence pertaining to pitch and tonal harmony (Dibben, 1994;Herff et al, 2021Herff et al, , 2023Koelsch et al, 2013;Martins, Gingras, Puig-Waldmueller, & Fitch, 2017;Serafine, Glassman, & Overbeeke, 1989). Note that this framework does not require, and the present results do not suggest, that the relationships underlying such representations are explicitly available to conscious awareness.…”
Section: Existence Of Rhythmic Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The present results contribute to support this analogy at Marr's computational level by providing evidence that a grammar (e.g., Rohrmeier, 2020a), if interpreted as a model of the listeners’ competence for rhythmic structure, carries predictive value toward listeners’ behavioral responses (cf. Herff et al., 2021 for converging evidence in the context of harmony). The present results also provide preliminary empirical grounding to theoretical proposals that the experience of musical structure may be understood as the result of cognitive operations algorithmically analogous to those of a parser as detailed by Jackendoff (1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both the prior and standardization are widely used in the auditory as well as music cognition literature (Beveridge, Cano, & Herff, 2021;Cecchetti, Herff, & Rohrmeier, 2022;Herff, Dorsheimer, Dahmen, & Prince, 2022;Herff, Harasim, Cecchetti, Finkensiep, & Rohrmeier, 2021;Herff et al, 2020;MacRitchie, Breaden, Milne, & McIntyre, 2020;Smit, Dobrowohl, Schaal, Milne, & Herff, 2020;Smit, Milne, Sarvasy, & Dean, 2022). Based on the research question at hand, each model then predicted a given dependent variable (vividness, distance, time, or emotional sentiment) whilst accounting for participant and trial effects through random intercepts.…”
Section: Statistical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While chord recognition focuses on local and key finding on global levels, music theory suggests the existence of several intermediate levels that are frequently conceptualized as being hierarchically nested (e.g., Hauptmann, 1853; Schenker, 1935; Salzer, 1952; Lerdahl and Jackendoff, 1983; Lerdahl, 2001; Rohrmeier, 2011, 2020; Rohrmeier and Moss, 2021). A number of psychological studies provide evidence for the perceptual reality of hierarchical organization in music (Krumhansl, 2004; Tillmann and Bigand, 2004; Koelsch et al, 2013; Farbood, 2016; Herff et al, 2021) but the exact relation between theoretically postulated and perceived hierarchies is not yet fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%