Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence 2017
DOI: 10.5220/0006199305830590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Self-organizing Maps System for Action Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the experiments performed in this study show that the recognition of unsegmented actions in online test experiments is quite high. When the performance results of this paper are compared to our earlier empirical studies, whether they are online experiments (Gharaee et al 2016(Gharaee et al , 2017c or offline experiments (Gharaee et al 2017b, a), there is a decrease in the acquired recognition accuracy of the system. An explanation for this may be that different sequences of actions span different time intervals, while a constant cutoff length is allocated to all of them through the sliding window.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the experiments performed in this study show that the recognition of unsegmented actions in online test experiments is quite high. When the performance results of this paper are compared to our earlier empirical studies, whether they are online experiments (Gharaee et al 2016(Gharaee et al , 2017c or offline experiments (Gharaee et al 2017b, a), there is a decrease in the acquired recognition accuracy of the system. An explanation for this may be that different sequences of actions span different time intervals, while a constant cutoff length is allocated to all of them through the sliding window.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For this, it is necessary that the sliding window contains the key activations of an action sequence continuously for a number of consecutive iterations, which is a restriction for the categorization task. The 75% correct categorizations should be compared to 83% correct that was obtained (Gharaee et al 2017b) when the dataset was segmented in advance in an offline experiment. The results show that the performance drops when the segmented action pattern vector of fixed length is used, but at the same time the system is capable of running online experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be accomplished by basically the same psychological methods used for investigating similarities between objects. In robotics, a common method for reducing the complexity of an action is to use a Kinect sensor that extracts the movements of a stick-figure representation of a person and then use a neural network to classify the reduced actions (e.g., References [43,44]). An analogy between how objects and how actions are represented in conceptual spaces is that action concepts share a similar structure with object categories; in particular, they have prototypes [45].…”
Section: Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems are psychologically motived, and they have not been developed with the aim of supporting human-robot communication. Recent computational work by Gharaee and her colleagues has resulted in an online system based on neural networks that can categorize and segment a number of bodily actions [43,44,48]. Such a system can be used by a robot to select a relevant verb (see Section 4.3) to be used in the robot's construction of sentences describing what is happening.…”
Section: Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%