2010 International SoC Design Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/socdc.2010.5682890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical routing architectures in clustered 2D-mesh Networks-on-Chip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Which has an impact on the EED and PLR. In fact, packet loss is mainly due to congestion in path, however, in case of link failure, packet can be loss due to time out [29,30].…”
Section: Rate Of Packet Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Which has an impact on the EED and PLR. In fact, packet loss is mainly due to congestion in path, however, in case of link failure, packet can be loss due to time out [29,30].…”
Section: Rate Of Packet Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HNoC is a scalable solution [15]. It integrates low-diameter topologies, that aided by efficient flow control and routing mechanisms, minimizes the overall power consumption and NoC latency [16]. Our architecture integrates five key components: (1) low NoC/high NoC, (2) policy keeper, (3) configuration control, (4) security mechanisms, and (5) monitors.…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we leave the issue of more advanced routing schemes to future work. The combination of XY routing and the previously describes addressing system of PyraMesh provides a deadlock free routing [12]. We illustrate the routing scheme in figure 9.…”
Section: Addressing and Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the injection saturation rate of the concurrent topologies falls with the growth of the number of modules, the saturation rate of throughput optimized PyraMesh roughly remains constant and outperforms the SMesh by up-to 110.7% for a 128x128 system. We summarize latency reduction (in %) of latency optimized PyraMesh in [12] can be classified as a simple example of PyraMesh, in this paper we define a much broader variety of topologies and describe a methodology to suit the appropriate topologies to different sets of design goals. Moreover, the authors conclude in [12] that the addition of hierarchy levels on top of the base mesh is not area-cost effective -a conclusion that we refute throughout the paper.…”
Section: Performance Analysis and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%