2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical recursive least squares parameter estimation of non-uniformly sampled Hammerstein nonlinear systems based on Kalman filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification techniques mainly distinguish themselves in the way the static nonlinearity is represented and in the form of optimization problem that is finally obtained. Known approaches for different types of nonlinearities and estimation methods can be found eg in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The Wiener model has a linear dynamic block followed by a nonlinear static block and many techniques have been proposed to solve the identification problems typically encountered in using this model, see, eg [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification techniques mainly distinguish themselves in the way the static nonlinearity is represented and in the form of optimization problem that is finally obtained. Known approaches for different types of nonlinearities and estimation methods can be found eg in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The Wiener model has a linear dynamic block followed by a nonlinear static block and many techniques have been proposed to solve the identification problems typically encountered in using this model, see, eg [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, real systems are inherently continuous‐time and, as a result, continuous‐time modeling improves the identification performance . Besides, since the state‐space modeling provides a deep insight into the nature of the physical systems, it has been a subject of recent research . Some of the distinguishing features of the state‐space‐based identification over the commonly used input‐output regression‐based one are as follows: (i) by the use of state‐space realization of a system, the well‐known Lyapunov stability theory can be conducted to achieve stable identification laws, which ensure boundedness of the estimated parameters; (ii) state‐space modeling eliminates the need for filtering techniques such as those used in the works of Wu and Chen and Cui et al arises in the continuous‐time identification, provided that the system states are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, which is the case considered in this paper, the state‐space identification becomes difficult because it includes the estimation of not only the unknown parameters but also the unknown states. It is noteworthy that two main strategies have been presented in the literature on Hammerstein state‐space identification: (i) identification algorithms that are under the assumption of the system states being known and (ii) hierarchical methods based on the cost function minimization problem, which commonly bring the system back to its discrete‐time input‐output representation . Recently, the authors proposed an observer‐based state‐space identification using an auxiliary model‐based observer .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, state estimation brings difficulty to the parameter estimation [29]. For linear Gaussian systems, the Kalman filter can achieve optimal estimation performance with a small amount of computational load, which is usually the preferred method of the state estimation for state-space models [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%