2010 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cisis.2010.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Random Graph Model for Off-line Handwritten Signatures Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other side, using the template matching model faced with the issue of testing the graph isomorphism in the effective way. In spite of that, some proposals of HSV systems basing on graph-based modeling has been appeared in the recent years including [16] for on-line and [12] for off-line signatures recognition. In both cases the graph-based modeling is used to handle the distinctive features connected with handwritten signatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other side, using the template matching model faced with the issue of testing the graph isomorphism in the effective way. In spite of that, some proposals of HSV systems basing on graph-based modeling has been appeared in the recent years including [16] for on-line and [12] for off-line signatures recognition. In both cases the graph-based modeling is used to handle the distinctive features connected with handwritten signatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In [12] it is done by utilization of the random graphs while in [16] the classifier is responsible to handle it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All these inter/intrapersonal morphological variations linked to the handwritten signature, added to the falsifications, make modelling this very particular image an intricate task. Many systems have been developed in order to model and verify the image of the signature [5,7,8,11,12,14,19,20,23,24,25]. In our case, we have opted for planar modelling based on neural networks.…”
Section: The False Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%