“…The water contact angle analysis showed that ZIF‐8, t‐Ce‐BTC, m‐Ce‐BTC, MIL‐101(Cr), MIL‐88B(Fe), and UiO‐66(Zr) were 80.0°, 8.7°, 15.4°, 5.3°, 13.6°, and 11.6°, respectively (Figure S15), which confirms that ZIF‐8 displays relative hydrophobicity nature as compared to the other five MOFs. The hydrophobic ZIF‐8 might induce the aggregation of Rha and change the conformation, resulting in the loss of enzyme activity [3,44] . In addition, Rha@MIL‐88B(Fe), Rha@MIL‐101(Cr), and Rha@UiO‐66 (Zr) did not exhibit fluorescence peaks at around 353 nm (Figure S14b‐d), which might be due to that the parent MOFs themselves can emit fluorescence [47–49] .…”