Hierarchical personality traits and the distinction between unipolar and bipolar disorders

Quilty, Lena C.; Pelletier, Marianne; DeYoung, Colin G.; Bagby, R. Michael

doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.012

Cited by 36 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, the Agreeable trait was negatively correlated with the MDQ, in line with the previously reported negative association between agreeableness and manic severity in bipolar disorders. 24,55,56 The Unsocial trait was also found to be positively correlated with the MDQ in the current study, in line with the following findings: the Unsocial trait represents a negative pole of Extraversion, 25 and the latter was decreased in bipolar II patients. 24 In the current study, the negative correlation found between the Intelligent trait and HCL-32 in patients with bipolar II disorder contradicted the positive correlation between the Intelligent trait and MDQ found in both of the bipolar groups.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Relationship between Chinese adjective descriptors of personality and emotional symptoms in young Chinese patients with bipolar disorders

Fan

et al. 2015

J Int Med Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Relationship between Chinese adjective descriptors of personality and emotional symptoms in young Chinese patients with bipolar disorders

Fan

et al. 2015

J Int Med Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These reactions are linked to what Gray and McNaughton (2000) called the Fight-Flight-Freeze system and are governed primarily by phylogenetically ancient brain systems in the hypothalamus and brain stem. Whereas Distress represents the major risk for unipolar depression, Volatility is associated specifically with risk for bipolar disorder (Quilty, Pelletier, DeYoung, & Bagby, 2013). …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ten aspects of the Big Five in the Personality Inventory for DSM–5.

DeYoung¹,

Carey²,

Krueger³

et al. 2016

Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

Self Cite

137

109

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

DSM-5 includes a dimensional model of personality pathology, operationalized in the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), with 25 facets grouped into five higher-order factors resembling the Big Five personality dimensions. The present study tested how well these 25 facets could be integrated with the 10-factor structure of traits within the Big Five that is operationalized by the Big Five Aspect Scales (BFAS). In two healthy adult samples, 10-factor solutions largely confirmed our hypothesis that each of the 10 BFAS scales would be the highest loading BFAS scale on one and only one factor. Varying numbers of PID-5 scales were additional markers of each factor, and the overall factor structure in the first sample was well replicated in the second. Our results allow Cybernetic Big Five Theory (CB5T) to be brought to bear on manifestations of personality disorder, because CB5T offers mechanistic explanations of the 10 factors measured by the BFAS. Future research, therefore, may begin to test hypotheses derived from CB5T regarding the mechanisms that are dysfunctional in specific personality disorders.

show abstract

“…The two aspects of each domain might represent the most important distinctions for discriminant validity within each domain of the FFM. Support for this premise has already been demonstrated in relation to clinical phenomena, such as schizotypy (DeYoung, Grazioplene, & Peterson, 2012) and mood disorders (Quilty, Pelletier, DeYoung, & Bagby, 2013), as well as nonclinical phenomena, such as social behavior (DeYoung, Weisberg, Quilty, & Peterson, in press) and implicit learning (Kaufman et al, 2010). In this research, we posited that the two aspects of extraversion might shed light on the relation between lower order indicators of extraversion and BAS sensitivity.…”

Section: The Big Five Aspect Scalesmentioning

confidence: 59%

“…The similarity in the pattern of association between enthusiasm and assertiveness might reflect their shared variance relevant to approach, or the saturation of the clinical scales with overall distress. The clinical significance of these differences in magnitude remains to be established; however, recent work has demonstrated the utility of enthusiasm in distinguishing between unipolar versus bipolar mood disorders (Quilty et al, 2013). Interesting, Naragon-Gainey, Watson, and Markon (2009) recently demonstrated a similar pattern of results: Namely, phobic anxiety was associated with all traits associated with approach, whereas depression was not associated with sensation seeking.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Extraversion and Behavioral Activation: Integrating the Components of Approach

Quilty

DeYoung

Oakman

et al. 2013

Journal of Personality Assessment

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This investigation evaluates the structure and correlates of lower order traits related to approach, specifically, facets of extraversion and behavioral activation system (BAS) sensitivity. A 3-factor structure of approach was derived in community and clinical samples: assertiveness, enthusiasm, and sensation seeking. All factors were positively associated with Openness/Intellect scores. Enthusiasm and assertiveness were both negatively associated with Neuroticism scores, but were distinguished by associations with Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. Sensation seeking was negatively associated with Conscientiousness scores. The 3 factors demonstrated a unique profile of association with components of impulsivity. Enthusiasm and assertiveness were negatively related to psychopathological symptoms, whereas sensation seeking was largely independent of psychopathology. Results suggest that approach is associated with 3 subfactors, which differ in their pattern or magnitude of associations with other variables, thus underscoring the importance of distinguishing among them. Further, results support the construct validity of the Assertiveness and Enthusiasm aspect scales of the Big Five Aspect Scales to assess traits at this level of the personality hierarchy.

show abstract

Hierarchical personality traits and the distinction between unipolar and bipolar disorders

Cited by 36 publications

References 38 publications

Relationship between Chinese adjective descriptors of personality and emotional symptoms in young Chinese patients with bipolar disorders

Relationship between Chinese adjective descriptors of personality and emotional symptoms in young Chinese patients with bipolar disorders

Ten aspects of the Big Five in the Personality Inventory for DSM–5.

Extraversion and Behavioral Activation: Integrating the Components of Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About