2015
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2014.06.0238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Pedotransfer Functions to Predict Bulk Density of Highly Weathered Soils in Central Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
12
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, our RMSE for RFM PTFs is within the range Estimation of bulk density and ECEC 653 reported by Ghehi et al (2012) for BD PTFs in Rwanda using k-NN, but it is slightly better than the performance of PTFs derived using BRT. However, our MLR PTFs performed slightly less well than those reported for highly weathered soils in Central Africa (Botula et al, 2015). The difference between our result and those of Botula et al (2015) could be attributed to the difference in the data sets used, the varying extent of both studies as well as the weaker correlation between BD and predictors used in this study (Table 5) compared to theirs.…”
Section: Performance Of Ptf Modelscontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, our RMSE for RFM PTFs is within the range Estimation of bulk density and ECEC 653 reported by Ghehi et al (2012) for BD PTFs in Rwanda using k-NN, but it is slightly better than the performance of PTFs derived using BRT. However, our MLR PTFs performed slightly less well than those reported for highly weathered soils in Central Africa (Botula et al, 2015). The difference between our result and those of Botula et al (2015) could be attributed to the difference in the data sets used, the varying extent of both studies as well as the weaker correlation between BD and predictors used in this study (Table 5) compared to theirs.…”
Section: Performance Of Ptf Modelscontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…However, our MLR PTFs performed slightly less well than those reported for highly weathered soils in Central Africa (Botula et al, 2015). The difference between our result and those of Botula et al (2015) could be attributed to the difference in the data sets used, the varying extent of both studies as well as the weaker correlation between BD and predictors used in this study (Table 5) compared to theirs. There is more variation in our data set as we have used legacy data which is a combination of data from disparate sources.…”
Section: Performance Of Ptf Modelscontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PTF estimates of bulk density are always based on SOC content according to the model of Adams () where bulk density of a soil can be modeled as mixture of organic matter and mineral component. The mineral components expressed as clay and/or silt content are identified as statistically significant explanatory variables (Bernoux et al, ; Benites et al, ; Botula et al, ; De Souza et al, ; Manrique & Jones, ). Also, the coarse fraction (>2 mm) and soil depth has predictive potential (Nussbaum et al, ) as well as the sum of basic cations (Benites et al, ) and other environmental covariates (De Souza et al, ).…”
Section: Ptfs In Earth System Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then k-nearest neighbor algorithms (e.g. NEMES et al, 2006;BOTULA et al, 2015), artificial neural networks (e.g. MINASNY et al, 1999), classification and regression trees (e.g.…”
Section: Te C Hniq Ue S To Develop a Nd Eval Uate Pt Fsmentioning
confidence: 99%